Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
@kitty, I think part of the confusion is that he has federal charges, but the state of Montana has picked up a conspiracy charge as a state charge. Both federal and state can charge him. Also they were in different jurisdictions.
The conspiracy charge in Montana is the most serious. If they think he was the moderator or administrator of a child porn board, and if they have the evidence, they will press very hard on the conspiracy charge.
They may or may not have all their ducks in a row in Montana as of now. They were able to arrest him because it only requires probable cause to get an arrest warrant; it takes more evidence than that to convict.
Of course, he will plea because they have all the IP addresses they need for a conviction. If they infiltrated that board for a few months before they shut it down, then they probably have concrete evidence that he was the administrator.
Usually they will act as another member or take over a member's identity who has been arrested on a child porn complaint in another situation. For example, if Joe Blow gets arrested on a child sex charge for nothing to do with this child porn board, they will find email communication between him and the board or to and from other people. Joe Blow then is tied to multiple areas and they threaten him with so much time that he allows the government to take over his identity.
They then sniff out a few other members of this board and arrest them. Unless they were using Tor or some strong encryption for communication, they know enough to make several arrests.
rewdiazepam
His lawyer was court appointed, she said she would have tried to roll everything up together if she had known about it. Unfortunately, we didn't know about Montana until the plea deal had already been made here.
I don't know when I will get to talk to him, (I think he is in Montana) but I will make sure I mention it to him.
Anyway, I know it is too late for this, but NEVER EVER EVER NEVER talk to law enforcement. Remember this, law enforcement only wants to talk to three types of people: 1) the victims of a crime, 2) the witnesses to a crime, and 3) the suspect in a crime. They are not interested in anybody else.
If you are not the victim or a witness to a crime, you can bet you are a suspect and had better keep your mouth zipped. Anything------anything----even the most innocent of remarks can and WILL be misquoted and turned around to use against you.
Example, they told him they did not want him, that they wanted the "big fish."
Hmmm, is that why they are doing their best to hand a terribly long prison sentence on him? That they really don't want him? Yet he gets years on one sentence and is looking at a minimum of 15 years in another state via a federal prosecution. What a bunch of liars.
So they were only after the "big fish." If they are attempting to convict him for conspiracy as one of the administrators of the board, they KNEW they had found their "big fish" in your son. That was all a bunch of lies by the police.
They just wanted to butter up your son and scare him so they could extract the most information out of him to bolster their case against him. Oh sure, they wanted other names so they could go after them, but they had no intention whatsoever----whatsoever----of being lenient to your son. Besides the police is not in control of the case anyway. The only person who could give him leniency is the DA or the judge. They are in no position to grant "breaks" or leniency.
You can bet with his email address and password to the site that more people will be implicated in this child porn board.
But that is water under the bridge. We have to go on now.
We will see what happens, but I support you and your son 100%. If you ever need me, just message me.
rewdiazepam
PS Law enforcement is nothing buy legalized gangsters with badges.
Also, I was wrong, he is still in Ohio. he just called me. He said he called this morning but only let it ring a few times (not long enough for caller ID to register), then hung up (I wasn't home). I told him to let it ring until the machine picks up. We don't get charged for the call if I don't press that button. Apparently one of his cell mates told him they only fly prisoners on Tuesdays???? He also pointed out what conspiracy means; I got this from wikipedia; In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. When he does get to Montana he will make sure his court appointed attorney knows that he has never had any contact with any other members of any boards.
Believe me, I appreciate your support , your advice, and all your help.
We are in no hurry for him to go because we are terrified about what he will be facing once he is out there, but at the same time we both want to get it over with.
1. A CP board that I believe was infiltrated and controlled by law enforcement for a time. I know what CP bust this was but I don't know all the specific details down to that level so I'm not sure this.
2. A defendant arrested as a part of this CP bust that gave law enforcement control of his online identities.
This is a long shot but I would find out the dates the board was in operation under the control of the founder, the date it was infiltrated by law enforcement, the dates the board operated under law enforcement control if any and compare them with the date your son gave law enforcement control of his online identities.
Many times the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing and I'm just wondering if there's any chance investigators in one location made your son an administrator or convinced whoever was running the board to make your son administrator without telling the other location what was going on. If your son became an administrator after he gave law enforcement control of his identities then that should work in his favor. If he was already an administrator by the time he turned over his identities but the board was under law enforcement control when he was made an administrator, then that might open up a whole bunch of other things.
Like I said before, definitely a long shot but I'd still check into it
Check the dates. It is possible that your son was NOT the board administrator but the authorities made him board administrator AFTER they assumed his identity----and you son had nothing to do with being an administrator.
He became administrator only after they MADE him one.
rewdiazepam