I'm completely lost. But its ok.

Did I mention that I recently received a "Rabbit" as a gift Katie bug?

Oh sweet, sweet Rabbit!

Don't think it's quite waterproof, though. It has a remote and it's Amazzzzzing!

Ask Mattie Moose for a recap...

A remote?! WOW. Waterproof is better, but remote is a close second..... LOL

;-)

k7..basically kate, cari, tossed, you and I are impatient.

Steph says give it a rest..be comfortable with yourself.

steph also suggested friends with benefits

kate said it wouldn't work for her based on emotional attachment from both sides on 2 different occasions.

said she needs more batteries to be single for awhile. Steph got a rabbit..gave us a typing of the sound it makes. Recommends it.

I hope that helps you be less lost.

Matty you should get paid for keepin everything straight
I think the wascally wabbits awe taking ovew this woild

Buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Pardon Tossy?


Buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

LMAO!

*tips hat in awe of the awesome that is maddiesdad*

A nerd laugh for you TA...accompanied by a lovely snort!

Whew!

I, for one, like a woman that is confident and is able to take care of herself (owns her your car, home, has a good job etc. :)). However, if a woman is too independent, it becomes a big turn-off.

In my experience, women that are too independent are afraid to show vulnerability and open up emotionally. It seems that they feel that if they show any kind of vulnerability or emotional connection to a man, that it opens them up for "being controlled" and they will NOT tolerate that (this is usually a result of being screwed over in a previous relationship). I understand that fear but it puts up a defensive wall that is nearly impossible to penetrate and often takes SO much effort to get through that men become frustrated at the lack of progress in the relationship and call it quits.

Simply spreading your legs and letting the guy have sex with you does not attract the "decent man" type.

And I am not implying that is what you do, Kate, but there are women out there that believe that sex is the only thing that men are after and if they provide that in the relationship that everything should be good and don't understand why they can't find a "decent guy".

Is there such a thing as too independent, bigguy?

Or are they just too independent for you?

The type that I am speaking of are too independent for ME. I want to have a relationship with someone that is able to open up emotionally and show some vulnerability. I can't have a successful relationship with someone that is emotionally unavailable ... and in my experience, the women that are "too independent" fit into the emotionally unavailable category.

I believe that there are a lot of women out there that complain about the same thing in men. They work too much, they don't show any vulnerability, they are inattentive jerks that feel they can repair the relationship by purchasing a gift.

Oh, those women sound like some of the men that my girlfriends have been out with.

Work-a-holics, ugh. Emotionally unavailable, ugh. Those are the people that aren't ready to be in a relationship - with ANYONE! Not just you bigguy. And you're right, material things make not difference. If they're unwilling to open up, they need to be alone.

It seems to be that these types of men feel they can repair a relationship by purchasing a necklace or some other trinket ... and the female counterparts feel they can repair a relationship by spreading their legs. IMO, neither of these does anything to fix a relationship.

Just from a healthy stand point, neither of those things will work! Not just your opinion, but rational thinking that should be the norm, but all to often, people pay a price, and put a monetary value on their time, love and energy to "shush" their mate. Pacifying anyone, man or woman with things in order to keep your feelings locked away in a safe place is weak. All to often men think that dispalying their emotions and letting someone in is what's weak.

Such a shame for them. They'll never experience true love. My dad is one of those men.