Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
It sounds like FL has put so many people on its registry that parents can't figure out who is dangerous and who is not. So, to help them, this country is identifying the "really" (whether that's true or not) dangerous people and putting signs on their lawns.
Isn't that basically saying that all of the other sex offenders they aren't putting signs on the lawn of aren't a danger? But isn't the whole point of the registry to identify dangers? It just seems like a way of admitting that most of the people on the registry pose no danger, and they know it.
100 Bucks say's this so called Sheriff is up for re election..
There have been a few cases(I don't have the links) where this same things have happened, mostly in the South and California, BUT the Federal Appellate Courts have ruled it unconstitutional......
It's kind of ironic since it seems like ForiDUH's sex offenders are COPS...Hell, it seems like everyday there's another FloriDUH cop or two getting arrested for messing with kids
http://mostboringradical.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/too-many-sex-offenders/
Here is a link to a Kansas case which is similar:
http://tinyurl.com/bmvkp2w
The key phrase to consider in the link about is as follows:
"Under the facts of this case, the probation conditions requiring Schad to post signs around his house and on his car announcing his sex offender status were not reasonably related to the rehabilitative goal of probation or to the protection of the victim and society. Here, the signage conditions made Schad an object of condemnation and ridicule. The signage conditions only confirmed society's outrage against Schad. The signage conditions were simply a punitive measure not reasonably related to rehabilitation.
We reverse and remand the case with directions for the trial court to sever the signage conditions from the order of probation."
Yes, the cases are not identical, but similar enough that I do not think placing sex offenders signs in front of his house will hold up to a court review.
rewdiazepam
Sorry, been a long day.
rewdiazepam
"Oh geez, Officer Buford.....that dern sign of yours must of spontaneously combusted!!!"
"Wow.. I really don't know how a sign meant for my house ended up at YOUR house, Officer Dipstick!"
Again, everyone realize this is just one county Sheriff in FL ( so far ) doing this!!
I wonder how many $10 signs it will take to replaced, repainted, relocated, and all the investigational time spent by officers to try to determine HOW this signs were removed, stolen, painted over, ect....
I can EASILY see thousands and thousands of taxpayer's dollars used up to finally it will be shut down.
And, TwoforJoy---I second that emotion..( f**k FL...)...lol
Have them made with names like Mike Hunt and Ima Hogg and Dick Morehead and then just randomly put them up on public property
Or how about Stewart Pidasso......lives here.. but he goes by Stew..... Stew Pidasso!!!!!