Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
In some jurisdictions, the DOC will require the inmate to give a lot of registration information prior to their release. I am not sure how they handle a federal conviction. If a few states do not already do this, then in the future, they DOC might even be authorized to do the first registration upon release. I don't know if any of them actually do the first registration at the present time, but that could possibly happen in the future.
In some states, this initial registration process could easily be done in prison since the DOC is the agency that handles all the registration process for the sex offender registry. It is certainly that way in Oklahoma.
If I remember correctly, there have been a couple of cases in which an inmate with sex crimes did not have a place to go upon their release, and they were reluctant to release him or her. But most cases if they have no place to go, they just become homeless and another sad statistic in this poor excuse of a criminal justice system we have in this country.
I suppose it they are released with paper time behind their prison sentence, then their PO or the state in which they are convicted has some input in the decision where they can go.
If they are unable to work, find a job, or support themselves, they will have to rely on family or government or public assistance.
I they are eligible for social security disability then yes, they can collect that and I think in most states they can get food stamps, although some states are placing restrictions on food stamp recipients.
I have no personal experience with any of this as I discharged my sentence in prison with no paper time. All this information is just information that I have learned by reading and researching. Someone else who has had personal experience may come along and help me out here.
rewdiazepam
They can draw the SS disability at any age at which they can prove a legitimate reason. And of course, they can draw SS at age 62 or 65 or whatever it is now as a retirement without having to have a legitimate reason as needed for disability.
But, the registry will not suffice as a reason to draw SS disability.
rewdiazepamj
http://tinyurl.com/p3k39bn
http://tinyurl.com/p6ccumj
rewdiazepam
I guess their goal of "maintaining strong family connections" only applies to the inmates, not the families of them!
It is possible for an SO to get into some residential care programs, but it is very difficult. Its an Adult Protective Services worker's worst nightmare.
I know a woman who is an APS worker. She says there are many people who are SO's who live on the street who have dementia. There is little they can do for them. Its cruel, and certainly does not promote public safety for anyone.
The bizarre part about this is that many people with dementia become sexually disinhibited as part of their disease. In fact, this guy I was going to see, who was not an SO as evidenced by the paperwork at the front of his chart, was swatting the aides on the butt, trying to kiss them during the shower, etc.. and reportedly enjoying it. It's odd to think that, in the rush to retribution, our society sees fit to put more and more people at risk by creating situations where people are more likely to offend.
Seems like there's something really wrong with this picture to me.
it was a song written and sung by women lifers. one of them had been locked up when she was 14. she is now in a wheelchair. i got to thinking what if she had gotten 40yrs or more instead of life? quite possibly her parents and siblings could have died or just dropped out of sight during her time in prison. wtf would she do, where would she go if released???
'
That being said, what am I to do when it's my husband and he'll have that label. Will Office for the Aging consider that an "illness" like they do my Mom's? They only forced the issue because they are a medical facility and hers is a medical need. It won't matter if they are even incapable of perpetrating anything....all that will matter is the label.
Sad....pitiful and sad.
SC passed a law a while back requiring nursing homes notify it's residents of any RSO's who are admitted to the home. Not that I want to die in an assisted living facility I'm worried that when I need help I won't be getting any. Who would come to the house of an aging RSO to help???
my heart breaks for anyone who doesn't have some kind of support or back up.
Even still, you have to wonder who will be there for us. There has been no contact with family for years now. They are very unlikely to come back.
Our society is very messed up. Apparently, we want to chose who gets to be taken care of and who doesn't. I'm so sorry you had to go through that, Sam. That is so wrong for your mother to be rejected because of a label. Bipolar is difficult but very manageable. Your Mom is lucky to have you, Sam.
In regards of where to go when someone gets out without a home plan? It depends. In Virginia, DOC sends prisoners back to the county jail where they were brought into the system. The county jail works with the Probation office on handling the release. I know of a few people that were released without a home plan and DOC (i.e. Probation & Parole) covered staying at a local Super 8 hotel and provided credit for meals at the IHOP owned by the Super 8. That generally lasts 30 days. During that time, the initial goals are to find a job, housing and go to weekly therapy and probation visits. A lot of the guys get work doing day labor construction.
If the SO cannot find stable employment, they can be violated. Those with mental issues generally end up civilly committed in Virginia.
You said, "Those with mental issues generally end up civilly committed in Virginia."
So they were perfectly sane enough to go to trial, but now that they want to be released after COMPLETING their prison sentence, they all of a sudden have mental issues and may have to be civilly committed? I realize that the burden to prove someone not sane enough to go to trial is much higher than a mental illness, but still.....
And I will bet that the issue of their mental illness was never considered at trial by a jury or taken into consideration as a mitigating factor in any plea bargain the defendant may have agreed to.
Nice system we have here. Land of the free and home of the brave.
rewdiazepam