Pulmonary Embolism Support Group
By far the most common form of pulmonary embolism is a thromboembolism, which occurs when a blood clot, generally a venous thrombus, becomes dislodged from its site of formation and embolizes to the arterial blood supply of one of the lungs. Symptoms may include difficulty breathing, pain during breathing, and more rarely circulatory instability and death.
cave76
Some people have reported that they had no (found) DVT but did develop a pulmonary embolism.
One article, published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 24, 2009:
http://general-medicine.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1124/6
snip:
"The authors offer four possible explanations: (
1) inadequate sensitivity of imaging studies for DVT;
(2) clots originating in the upper extremities, which were not studied here;
(3) complete embolization of thrombi from peripheral veins, leaving no detectable DVT upon imaging; and (
4) de novo clot formation in the pulmonary circulation.
The authors seem to favor the fourth explanation for many trauma patients, although this theory is unproven."
end snip
An interesting article in the American College of Emergency Physicians both agrees and then raises some dissenting points.
http://www.acep.org/MobileArticle.aspx?id=47233&coll_id=613&parentid=740
[I think that fat globules and perhaps other 'foreign objects' have also been suggested ]
One article, published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 24, 2009:
http://general-medicine.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1124/6
snip:
"The authors offer four possible explanations: (
1) inadequate sensitivity of imaging studies for DVT;
(2) clots originating in the upper extremities, which were not studied here;
(3) complete embolization of thrombi from peripheral veins, leaving no detectable DVT upon imaging; and (
4) de novo clot formation in the pulmonary circulation.
The authors seem to favor the fourth explanation for many trauma patients, although this theory is unproven."
end snip
An interesting article in the American College of Emergency Physicians both agrees and then raises some dissenting points.
http://www.acep.org/MobileArticle.aspx?id=47233&coll_id=613&parentid=740
[I think that fat globules and perhaps other 'foreign objects' have also been suggested ]
Posts You May Be Interested In
-
Look at what my best friend did with my picture!
-
We all have 24 hours in a day. How we spend these hours is important. Watching a little bit of a video about how sitting affects us made me aware of how much sitting and laying down I do. Gonna have to work on that.Your turn. Tell me another truth.
http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/pulmonary-embolism/
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/pulmonary-embolism/DS00429/DSECTION=causes
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/pe/causes.html
I was told it was very rare to have clots form in the lungs this way and that's one of the reasons they're still investigating what may have caused the PE.
Did they perform the ultrasound at your pelvis or upper extremities?
My ultrasounds were never done at those points, so no matter how great the equipment was------they wouldn't have seen them there. (But my DVTs were found in my legs, the most common and often the only place they look for DVTs so that wasn't a problem for me.)
Another thing---- I never had symptoms of a DVT, at least not symptoms other speak of. No pain or swelling or redness in the legs. My first 'hint' was pain in my lungs, coughing that doubled me over with pain Thanks to a numbnuts doctor all that was ignored until I wound up in the ER (where I had been taken by the ambulance after I'd called 911 from home!)
I think the most common "other substance" embolism is actually an air embolism, but any of those do take pretty special circumstances to get, and I would doubt it being too common a cause of PE-presenting patients with no identified DVT and I think a person who had a different type of embolism would be aware that it was that and not a blood clot, so I doubt there's been any confusion on that point. I mean, if it weren't a blood clot I doubt they even would need the 'normal' PE treatment.
Personally, I would imagine that like many things, there's a pretty big combination of these above mentioned reasons which account for the people who aren't diagnosed with DVT as well.
Also DVTs in the upper extremities are far less likely to travel to your lungs vs lower extremity PEs. I've had both types of DVTs. .
Interestingly, the Cleveland Clinic site does mention cement., but it's in reference to polymethylmethacrylate cement,which is used in orthopedic surgeries, like hip replacements. So I suspect that must be the cement reference mentioned in the other discussion about whether cement is a possible cause for PEs.
The research I consulted was specifically about cement dust, more specifically, silica containing cement dust from construction site. From the way they explained where the silica dust may originate from, there likely is some in our building: they've been drilling cement, foundations, drywall as they're evergreening the building while it is mostly empy (only the 1st and 21 to 26th floors are currently occupied. We occupy from the 21st to 26th and they're currently working on the 24th and 25th. I'm on the 23rd.
When I had my PEs, they were work on the 22nd and was on the 23rd and the main lobby, where I had to go through several times a day.
I had no symptoms of a DVT prior to my PE and there was nothing found in my legs when I was in the hospital. Nobody ever mentioned it, so I'm just now finding out that this is considered strange.