Hepatitis C Support Group
Hepatitis C is a blood-borne viral disease which can cause liver inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver cancer. The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is spread by blood-to-blood contact with an infected person's blood. Many people with HCV infection have no symptoms and are unaware of the need to seek treatment. Hepatitis C infects an estimated 150-200 million people worldwide.
Treatment has been hell for me but if it actually works I'll deal with the long term consequences as they arise.
No disrespect to anyone on this site who believes differently, but if I can avoid liver disease, a transplant, etc its worth a shot.
can anyone who has finished tx talk about what their continuing sides are? and do they last forever? thanks and sending love xo
All we can do is make an "informed decison" about whether to take tx or not.
20 years ago my Dr. told me there was a 5% chance of success on interferon. Then along comes Riba and the chances go up to 50%.
Now there will be telaprevir that boosts to 85%.( 31% for non responders).
It is getting better and yes we could stay afloat on our leaky boats for a while BUT we could also, maybe, get to shore safely
Sorry about the metaphor here but it's one that goes through my mind.
Again here is the latest update video for Hep 1ers.
http://www.hcvadvocate.org/presentations/telareal.htm
Busyexec- you wanted to see what past people think, the link I sent had some people that had been on tx 10 years ago. Read up on some of them and see you see it is common.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Hepatitis-Social/Long-term-side-effects-of-interferon/show/866107
Some people chose no to do tx and if it is the right decision for them, then they need to be confident in their choices.
We all do, whatever decisions we make re tx.
Mema, you ar the last person on this board who would offend anyone! :-)
I could have waited for tx also. But the determining factor for me was when a friend was told by his doctor that he had time to wait to do tx. He was in no danger and had plenty of time to wait.
2 yrs later, he was on a transplant list. He did get a new liver, but his body rejected it and once again, he was blessed to get yet a 2nd liver. Hep attacked his new liver, which came from a 16 yr old child, and as the end result, Frank still died.
The liver is the largest organ. The doctors take a very small sample of it, and who is to say that the docor didnt just get a piece of the healthy liver, while the remaining liver is completely diseased. Everyone is right. There is no right or wrong decision, to treat or not to treat. It is each individuals choice to make.
I have been one of those who have suffered horrific mental sides. I have children, and grandchildren I wont to see grow up, so I felt like I had to gamble on this. I dont know if I'll achieve SVR, but I am still content with the decision to tx. BUT!!!!!!!!!! I STILL cant shake the what if's concerning the post tx sides. I feel like I dont have a competent primary doctor, so after tx, if permanent sides occur, I'll be up a shit creek without a paddle. It does worry me, the post tx sides, but I feel like I HAD to gamble on treating or not treating.
I hope this makes some kind of since to yall. After I struggled so hard to find the right way to word this. LOL
Being geno 2, six years ago I was told to wait for new meds, nothing happened in the meantime and I decided to treat, I just wanted to be rid of the thing whatever the odds...was it worth it and what the consequences will be, only time will tell, but I took my gamble....not treating is the same, a personal decision and Mema, I agree with Trap :)))
What I did not expect or even understand at the time was Brain FOG and Riba Rage. Had no clue. My family is filling me in daily on my life that I seem to somehow missed. :-/ Otherwise, tx wasn't that bad. Not like it was for poor Paindora or anything.