Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
In the context of laws themselves, they will likely be seen valid because the Halloween law is adjudicated by multiple courts as being valid. Notwithstanding this, in Missouri, the state Supreme Court ruled that the Halloween law applies to RSO's convicted before the law was enacted. Therefore, unless a federal court intervenes to say otherwise, your argument might very well be idealistic on the level of the individual states.
I do not think I ever mentioned a Christmas / Easter law. In fact, my post had nothing to do with the
Christmas or Easter laws. My point was that when the lawmakers continue to add law after law and enhance the regulations for the registrants, at some point it becomes punitive instead of civil---and that would create problems for the registry.
I fully understand that the Oklahoma situation focused on a retroactive application of the law and would not affect those convicted after the law was passed. But the SORNA portion of the Oklahoma law only became punitive when they kept adding not only more and more laws year after year, but also the tier levels.
I do not know about an idealistic argument, but it is hardly idealistic for the thousands of registrants who were dropped from the registry because of the Starkey decision.
rewdiazepam
No, I was just bringing up the situation we had here in Oklahoma, but I do understand and agree with your logic and the points you were making regarding the Christmas and Easter laws.
I agree that I did get off topic and that might have caused the confusion.
rewdiazepam