Pulmonary Embolism Support Group
By far the most common form of pulmonary embolism is a thromboembolism, which occurs when a blood clot, generally a venous thrombus, becomes dislodged from its site of formation and embolizes to the arterial blood supply of one of the lungs. Symptoms may include difficulty breathing, pain during breathing, and more rarely circulatory instability and death.
This may sound funny to you a lawyer but I would think of suing that
Doc. Or at least sending him a letter telling him what you think he
did wrong
Welcome and the best of life to you.
I had a couple of thoughts after reading through your whole diary entry.
First, I'm confused why things got so bad with the PE. Hadn't you already been on warfarin for 10 days when you went into the hospital? That should've helped with the PE and kept things from getting so bad...but perhaps I missed something?
Second, it sounds like you've already diagnosed yourself with PTS, but, truthfully, it's a little premature for that. You're about two months out from diagnosis with the DVT and you're still in the acute healing stage. PTS reflects permanent damage and is really hard to assess until you're well past this initial phase. Some doctors will diagnose PTS at six months, but most will wait even past that.
From my own person experience, I've had two DVTs and the first was quite severe and painful. I was pretty uncomfortable for a while, with the worst time being the first 2-3 months. I slowly improved over time and had weird aches and pains probably up until around two years. I'm nine years out now from that first DVT and I don't have PTS. I really have very little outside of the leg being permanently larger than the other one and the occasional tightness (usually when I get too hot).
So, I guess I'm trying to say, that you shouldn't get too hung up on symptoms at this point and diagnose yourself with PTS. You might not wind up with it at all, in the long run.
I know some folks do wind up with scarring from all the blood draws. (Sounds so uncomfortable!) If at all possible, you ought to try to find a lab or a doctor that has a finger-prick tester for your INR. I have a finger-prick home tester that I use and it is pretty reliable. Having access to a finger-prick machine might make your life a little easier. I know my doctor uses the same machine in her office that I have at home. Some labs or coumadin clinics also have the finger-prick machines, but you'd have to do some research to find them.
One thing that struck a cord with me is how "rubbish" docs can be at checking for PEs once a DVT has been diagnosed, even when there are fairly obvious symptoms. I know the treatment is the same, but you'd probably be admitted to hospital for PEs & monitored, whereas this isn't always the case for DVT. Yeah, CT scans cost money, but if you've significant chest/breathing problems when a DVT is diagnosed, they really should rule it out.
One thing I'd like to note is that you may never get an explanation, for anything. That's not negligence or apathy on the part of doctors. It could be that they simply don't have the answers. I would just tuck that in the back of your mind for moments where you may feel some frustration.
Also I have scarring in my right arm vein because I can't draw blood out of my left arm any longer due to a previous DVT in my left arm. You just find a different vein to work with if it's a problem.
You seem to have fallen through some cracks in the system. I'm just glad you somehow made it through.
The thing about diagnosing PE with DVT is that usually treating the DVT is the identical treatment for small PE's and doesn't require diagnosing them to cure them. Besides, you can have a CT or V/Q scan that looks perfectly clean and have a clot move into your lung on the way back up the hallway to the ED, so testing is predicated on symptoms. No use doing a study on a non-symptomatic patient that you can't repeat if/when the symptoms begin. Anyone who has significant pulmonary or cardiac symptoms with DVT should be checked for PE, if only because at that point it is necessary to decide if thrombolysis (tPA, etc.) is required to save the patient's life. People who present (like I did) with the pulmonary and cardiac symptoms but no apparent DVT just get treated for PE. They never chase down the originating clot. No need to. Treatment is the same. Why delay treatment and put the patient through more radiation exposure to satisfy curiosity?
I know this is counter-intuitive to a lot of people who aren't in healthcare. I myself (with both parents and two grandmothers with history of PE/DVT) will just have to be satisfied with "you probably have an inherited coagulopathy of some sort, but we aren't sure what and testing is not 100% accurate because we just haven't discovered all of them yet" to help me make the decision to be a lifer on coumadin. Doesn't satisfy my curiosity (especially since I majored in genetics at college before going into nuclear med), but the testing won't change my management, so I just have to do what I think is best with the information available to me.
In my case, an earlier PE diagnosis could have resulted in different treatment. I also would not have had to take meds for pneumonia and the cough and blood could have been addressed better. At the end of the day, I am just so glad to still be here! Thank you for your thoughts.
Mike
http://www.dailystrength.org/people/3854895/journal
Off to see the pulmonologist this morning. Will keep everyone updated.
Ferr