Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Support Group
This community is a place where members can discuss current events and weigh in on what's going on in the world.
This community is a place where members can discuss current events and weigh in on what's going on in the world.
But if it was taken 3-4 months after the flare, it would show an inactive lesion that does not enhance with the contrast, instead it highlights without the contrast and the possible diagnosis that would be listed would be many more and MS would be one of the possibilities. You would have to be monitored or more testing before a diagnosis could be determined
A lesion after it is formed can leave an old lesion or heal to the point of no longer showing. I think it would take more than 4 months for a lesion to heal to the point it no longer shows-but I have never read of that time needed?.
I would be more concerned about an LP because he doesn't know what is causing your symptoms-and an LP can rule out many things besides MS- those other things i would be more worried about. 15% of people with MS will not have a positive LP. But I think an LP will show if there is an infection in the CNS---that you would have to look up, I'm not sure I remember correctly. Ask him if it would help to rule out anything, given he's not certain what it is.
http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/diagnosingms.html
"Nor do MRI scans always pick up MS lesions. There is evidence that some older lesions remyelinate sufficiently to be undetectable with MRI scans. Having said this, the vast majority of people with a definite dx of MS will show evidence of disease activity on MRI scans. "
From what I understand the lesions do not always appear right away and when they do they have to eliminate other causes. I don't don't think it is accurate to assume you don't have MS based only on the 1 MRI. You may want to return for another later in time.
I certainly hope it is not MS. But in the meantime keep a daily journal of your symptoms to give to the nuero when you return.And don't be afraid to tell him everything. He needs to know it all in order to diagnose and treat it.
I know how hard it is to live with the daily symptoms and MS and not be treated. I am going through it now. I was only recently diagnosed and return on the 21st. I also know how it feels to be constantly told nothing is wrong. It took 7 years for this day to come and many here even longer.
Why does he feel you have had a life threatening experience. I ask because this might be why he is ruling out MS. And is he treating the symptoms?
Good luck to you.
"
I decided that I needed to get to a different neurologist this time. Unfortunately I couldn't get an appointment to see him right away. I failed some points on the basic neurological exam, although he wouldn't specify which ones. I do know that he said I have hyperreflexia in my right knee and I have ankle clonus in my right ankle. I looked up both online and they point to nerve damage. He's done an EMG and the MRI so far. He wants to sent me to pt for my leg but doesn't even want to hear about my other symptoms so I'm assuming that means he doesn't care about treating them either.
I don't know if I should look for another opinion elsewhere or wait and see how things go with this guy. Shouldn't at least want to hear about my other symptoms even if he doesn't feel there are any other tests to run right now? Should I maybe go to my general doctor to deal with my other symptoms until a diagnosis is made? I'm worried about waiting for a diagnosis to be made because of the paralysis issue but if lesions aren't showing on the MRI at this point I don't know if going somewhere else would even make a difference.