Scapegoat Wanted: Inquire Within...
I've been doing some research lately on family dynamics and roles that are assigned to each member in the family. Why do so many families have a 'Black Sheep' or 'Scapegoat?' What need does that particular position fill? Is it valid?

I discovered that the Scapegoat is usually a member of a dysfunctional family unit. This person is almost always a very strong family member with a very caring nature. Personality traits that can open the door to being recruited as the 'Scapegoat' are inner strength, truth-telling, capacity for caring, and black-and-white thinking. To explain: their caring temperament causes them to endure the negative behavior because despite the abuse, they still love the perpetrator(s). If someone tends to naturally have black-and-white thinking (everything is either all good or all bad) and also is a strong individual, they will not ignore the 'elephant in the living room.' They draw attention to the family dysfunction and thus become a target. This family member will 'tell it like it is' or otherwise put a spotlight on the real problem instead of ignoring it so no one has to actually deal with it. This is the child that will act out verbally or behaviorally and literally acts like the Canary in the coal mine, alerting everyone involved that something is not right. This sets up a dynamic in which the 'Scapegoat' is castigated and punished by all the family members for daring to notice the leaks in the Titanic.

I was watching a show this afternoon called "The Emperor Has No Clothes." In this tale, no one wants to confront the truth that there is no cloth, because then by definition they would be branded as useless or stupid for not being able to see it...so everyone just goes along with the scenario so as not to make waves. This is the role that most family members will play because it protects them from punishment, retaliation and ostracization. The child who finally points out that the Emperor is indeed naked is the Scapegoat. In the tale, ultimately everyone takes up the cry, and the Emperor proudly continues and refuses to acknowledge the truth...sadly, that is not normally what occurs in the family dynamic.

People who hop on the bandwagon and flog the Scapegoat do so for several reasons. Please note that many of these reasons are not 'conscious' but part of a desperate, subconscious attempt to retain a socially appropriate image:

Since they are not normally emotionally as strong as the Scapegoat, it is easier to shut out or blame that family member than it is to confront the real underlying issue.
Participating in bullying the Scapegoat allows them to escape the same fate - they could be next, after all
Venting aggression on one family member is a form of stress relief to deal with the underlying issues that are not being addressed, without actually having to address them
Participants subconsciously (or consciously) believe that drawing attention to the sins (however large, small, factual or make-believe) of the Scapegoat, they make themselves appear better. Unfortunately, they do not realize that the ruse is flimsy and obvious to onlookers.
Participants are embarrassed because the Scapegoat has usually either told the truth about family dysfunction (whether it be abuse, alcoholism or other problems) or acts out the dysfunctional dynamic behaviorally. This person must be punished for making it public

Unfortunately, once branded, the Scapegoat has no way out. No matter what this person does, what they achieve, or how hard they try to please the dysfunctional family unit, they will never be allowed to break out of the family role that has been handed to them. They can never be forgiven for either telling about, or acting out the family dysfunction. The reason they can never be forgiven, is because the participants would then be forced to acknowledge that there is something wrong. Also, since part of the dynamic is stress relief, if the Scapegoat is allowed to break out of their role, by default another is usually chosen from amongst the dysfunctional family unit. There is a sense of self-preservation: keep the Scapegoat in that role to prevent me from being next to assume that role.

Keep in mind, it is NOT the Scapegoat's fault that their sins are held under a microscope while everyone else is given a free pass. This type of family structure is very abusive and destructive. That being said, there are traits that make it more likely that an individual will be chosen for this role:

Tends to be a strong individual
Tends to have black-and-white thinking
Often very outspoken or sensitive - will either point out the defect or 'act out' behaviorally in reaction to the unhealthy environment
Usually has a very large capacity for caring - this causes them to tolerate the unfair, negative treatment. They care for their family members and thus endure
Unable to separate self from criticism heaped upon them - will internalize negative message and blame themselves for the abusive behavior
Sometimes is 'different' - for example, handicapped, adopted, has some sort of physical or mental flaw - could have habits or mannerisms that deviate from 'normal'

How to break the cycle? On the rare chance the participants are willing to listen and be made aware of this cycle of blaming the Canary instead of dealing with the root problem, this would be ideal. Sadly, they are usually unwilling to recognize the problem, as evidenced by the creating of a Scapegoat position in the first place.

The person given the unenviable role of Scapegoat has a number of options. Counselling would be first on the list. Through that, the victim can learn what set them up for this role, how to change what is in their power to change, and hopefully learn that they do not deserve the level of suffering they are being handed. They can also be taught the tools to prevent themselves from becoming a victim of this kind of pigeon-holing in their future relationships in order to prevent repeating the tragedy over and over in subsequent relationships.

Ultimately, it appears that most Scapegoats have to actually resign their roles. This usually involves severely curtailing or eliminating completely any contact with the participants of their suffering. This can be an extraordinarily scary and painful experience. It can also be quite liberating. This option can give the victim the opportunity to heal, recover self-esteem, and regain a sense of purpose and balance in their lives. Please be aware that the participants do NOT want you to resign your role! Because if you do, they have to deal with the problem, or they could be targeted next. Their behavior will often escalate before it extinguishes.

Sadly, the participants usually never learn their lesson once the Scapegoat quits. They will actively seek out a replacement - I saw this evidenced in a family where 4 children were successively foisted into this role as their predecessor 'quit.' And amazingly, if the ex-Scapegoat ever does reappear, the participants will eagerly place them back in the same role. It is very important to realize that we cannot change people. As long as they choose to live with the dysfunction, and as long as blaming others 'works' for them and prevents them from having to confront whatever it is they are avoiding, they have no vested interest in change. All we can do is save ourselves...

This was written by Julie Wilson and shared by permission after her years of personal research

AllK