Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
If the government finds illicit images or videos on the hard drive or any digital device, they will charge the individual with either receipt or possession of CP. If they find the images in the “shared” folder of a P2P program, they will add a distribution charge.
Unless the accused can somehow prove that the images were there b/c of a virus----VERY unlikely---or that someone else downloaded the images, he will be charged.
The government does not really care how the images found their way on the hard drive, but only that they are there. If they find images, it is difficult to argue that the accused is not guilty of possession; after all, the images are there---and that constitutes possession.
The fact that the government seems not to care how the images got there is unfair, but that is the nature of CP investigations.
Nak mentioned that she hired a forensic computer guy and did it help? No, even though the computer person found that the 3 illicit images were downloaded by mistake, did it help her son?? No, he still pled guilty and went to prison. Maybe from a psychological standpoint Nak and her son felt better knowing that the images were downloaded by mistake, but it made no difference in the charges.
This is particularly true if images are downloaded from a P2P file sharing program. Law enforcement has already seen the illicit files in the shared folder and may have even downloaded a few of them from the accused for evidence, so obviously the files were there. They only have to determine the IP address of the computer, find out who the ISP is, and issue a subpoena to that ISP to find the physical address of the computer. Then they get another search warrant for the house at the physical address and they raid the house.
On another note, defendants don’t usually get caught on a P2P for downloading, but for sharing---having the illegal file in their shared folder. And what some people don’t realize is that in most P2P programs, an illegal file can be shared before it even completes its download. In a P2P program, someone else can upload the very file as it is being downloaded.
I can only think of two cases in the past six or seven years---out of thousands of cases--- in which a computer forensics expert ever made a difference. In both instances, a virus was the cause of the download and the prosecutor dropped the charges.
A much better investment---and one I recommend---is for the accused to hire a health professional to do a psychosexual evaluation on the accused. A positive psychosexual examination will show that the offender is a very low risk to reoffend or be a continuing threat to society. Your attorney will know about these evaluations, so mention it to him.
These evaluations are important as they are done by a unbiased health professional, whom judges respect. Submitting a positive psychosexual evaluation to the DA can help in the plea negotiation stage for a lighter sentence or to the judge at sentencing. They are much less likely to render a more severe sentence if the offender is not considered a danger to reoffend.
rewdiazepam
His forensics reported that he never searched those words the FEds said he did, and that the 3 that were downloaded were obviously accidental and never looked at.
I'm sorry.. but I have his proof of innocence.. and the Floriduh Innocence Project said we had a good defense. They never helped because he didn't have a lifetime in prison.
But we have it and we'll use it.. not sure when but I feel it will help in someway some day.
Proof of innocence is important and we have it. Even tho the prosecutor and plea agreement were lies.
When we moved here to Philly all the 6 lawyers we went to were shocked they even took him to court, because of the forensics. I feel that if we weren't in Floriduh he wouldn't be going thru this right now.
Rew is correct. Even having a cp on your computer even tho you didn't know it was there is illegal. And also not reporting it if you see it is also illegal.
My son also went thru that psychosexual evaluation and it was enough.. plus the judge new my son was innocent... that the judge gave my son mental health treatment upon being released from prison and not SO Treatment.. so my son didn't have to take SO treatment because of that evaluation. which we had to pay a lawyer when my son was release another $5K to get that straightened out with the court . His PO and supervisor wouldn't let the SO treatment go until we did that here in Philly. That evaluation cost us $2500