Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
Frankly, I don't see how much it matters if they have DNA evidence or not.
Your son is not going to trial, and his attorney will try to work out the best plea bargain possible. He has multiple counts, so going to trial would probably not be wise. Unless the DAs witnesses just collapse, a plea is his only option.
The DNA evidence is not relevant if you son was going to plead guilty anyway.
If the DA tests this supposed DNA and the DNA does NOT match, then he has to share that information with your son's attorney and that will help your son greatly.
So, if I was the DA, I am not sure I would want to test the DNA. He can probably get a conviction without the DNA, but if you son is not a match for the DNA, then the DA's case is in trouble.
I suspect this supposed DNA does not even exist. If he DID indeed have DNA, he would not have told it or let it be known until it was tested.
It is unlikely that the DA would make it know that he has some untested DNA.
Unless your son's attorney knows for a fact that some DNA does exist, then the DA might just be trying to scare your son so he will accept a plea.
rewdiazepam
THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR IN FORENSIC DNA TESTING, By William C. Thompson
http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/GeneWatch/GeneWatchPage.aspx?pageId=57