I hope you get an answer, but from what I have heard, the courts do not look kindly on a parent who is with a SO. I would suggest finding an attorney to help you fight.

i honestly have no answers for you and the only advice that i can come up with is to be well prepared and armed.

if he has no restrictions, make sure that you have all the paperwork around and ready stating that for when you need it.

and any and all references as to character, work habits/records, commendations from work, everything that you can get your hands on!

Once he is off probation or any paper time, I don't think they can legally do much regarding the children.

I don't think there is any law or statute that prevents a registrant from being around minors, even those who are not his own.

But, a problem may occur with CPS.

I was not sure so I did some research and found this on the Internet----------

""""While it is not "illegal" for a child to live in the same home so long as there is no court order (criminal or otherwise) preventing it., that does not mean that, if DSHS (CPS) gets a call re: potential risk, it won't investigate and/or remove the child based upon the past conviction. Frankly, it's not unusual for the state to do so and then seek court approval (the alternative being doing nothing and risking front page negative press). I like to think DSHS tries its best to protect children, but yes, sometimes there are "knee-jerk" reactions. That's why, though they're empowered to remove on assessing risk, the matter MUST go before a court within 72 hours. Depending on the facts and potential similarities between prior victim and present child (sex/age/etc), the court may/may not find sufficient risk to justify continued removal."""""

I think you would be better served to contact an attorney to be sure.

rewdiazepam

Children and Youth had no issue with my husband coming home and living with our kids because they weren'this "victims" and they're not girls. But we're married and he's their dad., and tere's no other party to throw a fit.
From what I understand, each state is different. Like the others have said, do your research and make sure you have all your paperwork

I would ask a lawyer at aavo.com what the specific rules are and what the outlook is in your state. The best thing to do though is to get a free consult with a lawyer.

I know his charge wasn't against a "child" but in the eyes of the state the victim in his case was a"child".

How old are your kids? At a certain age their word is more likely to carry more weight with the judge.

Just Google Aavo find a lawyer think that will work

I'll be praying for your situation to become lighter and brighter days ahead.been thru a lot same kinda thing almost .pm me if you like me to talk to u about it. I tried to post in here but message wouldnt pop up ;(

NY ACS decided to be pieces of crap to my family right before my husband went away. If they decide they need money or have slow days they may come around and bother you. They get kickbacks and raises for keeping a family in the system. They aren't in the business of keeping families together, they re in the business of getting money whenever they can. They aren't a government agency but they do work closely with the government and they get away with anything they want. They don't need actual proof something happened. It's not like criminal court where you have to have the burden of proof to prove you did something there just has to be a "51% chance something might happen" for them to take action. They have made mine and my children's life miserable all because they think they may have found something on my husbands computer that may or may not be an indication he did something to my daughter. They talked to my daughter extensively and did more damage. They don't care about families. Sorry I went off on a tangent. ACS really irks me. My only advice would be to talk to a really good family court lawyer. Make sure they are willing to fight ACS and not just go with what they say. They will try to put in place ridiculous obstacles that will have you stuck in the system for years. Just make sure you're prepared. Find someone good and talk to them about the "what ifs" and be ready to call them if ACS shows up. Another thing to keep in mind...if they do show up at your house and tell you the kids have to go or your husband has to go tell them you want to see the court order. They may try to intimidate you by bringing a cop with them but they do that for their own protection. They are not legally allowed to do ANYTHING unless they have a court order. And have the lawyer on speed dial. I don't really think it will come down to it from what I read of your original post but you need to be prepared just in case. Good luck and you and your family are in my prayers.

Ps. If there are any spelling/grammar errors I apologize. I'm using a new phone and I'm having trouble using the keyboard.

grammar nazis need not be present!!!! :D

alil76,
The reason that that Organization gets away with that is because people are not challenging it in the right way.
There is NO constitutional provision allowing for "Privatized Policing of Citizens".

It is also a fact that No state has the right to suspend the rights of any citizen based solely on alleged "probable cause".
The Fourth Amendment says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.".

Forget what is being done and who is allowing it.

Forget prior rulings.

It is essential for we as Americans to understand something. The Courts do NOT make the laws.
Courts are simply the trier of fact.

Stick to the facts and fundamental constitutional intentions.

My first question would be a basic fundamental question. If, "NY ACS", is NOT a government agency, where then do they derive their jurisdiction?

And what constitutional provisions allow any "Private Company" to have such jurisdiction?

Absent constitutional provision, absent constitutional jurisdiction, then any person removed from their home, minor or adult, is kidnapping by definition of Federal Law.

Forget state laws and forget state constitutions.

Neither are worth the paper they are written on unless they fully comply with the United States Constitution.
Any violation of the United States Constitution is a Federal Jurisdictional issue.

My suggestion,
File suit in Federal Court alleging violations of the 4th and 5th amendments of the United States Constitution as well as violations of Any other amendments that the situation may involve.

If you can not afford an attorney, Then file in pro se and demand court appointed legal counsel based on the fact that the 4th and 5th amendment of the US Constitution are liberty violations and both require legal representation and in all cases of liberty issues, court appointed legal counsel is required.