Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
The Federal Prisons are better places to stay. My son has the music room where he's in a band there, getting his GED and taking art lessons. He wishes he could practice his Kung fu but they're not allowed to practice martial arts in prison. The food is better and he can buy more things in commissary like a radio and a watch (which he needs because everything runs by the clock) But he gets less good time, if any. When you're in state the living conditions can be a hundred times worse.. my son was in Sanford county.. where Zimmerman is who killed that boy. . It's one of the worse shitholes you could imagine. But you get more good time off your sentence.
As far as attorney you need a 'cybercrime' attorney. They're the latest in specialized attorneys. Our case was seen in Orlando and our attorney is from Miami, which cost us more because I had to fly him. But he was worth it. 1 year less in sentencing is worth it. I think if we kept the first crappy attorney my son would have gotten a lot more than , maybe even the 10 years maximum that was in the plea bargain. He got 30 months, minus those deductions that our forensics proved.
1st attorney cost $25,000 and I'm still fighting with him thru the Florida Bar. 2nd was $50,000 plus expenses and then we had 2 forensics, therapy and our own psych evaluation and he was in Ft. Lauderdale so that was a 4 hour drive to see him. Not counting phone bills, commissary and other extras defending him cost over $100,000 and I'm not a rich woman by any means.
As technologies change there are more and more ways this can get there too. Back in 1996 when my case occurred I was a member of Prodigy (which was one of three main ways you could access the Internet back then - you couldn't simply open a browser and go where you wanted to go as you can today - you joined a service such as AOL, Prodigy, or one other that I can't think of at the moment and that service acted as what they called an "on-ramp" to the information superhighway). With Prodigy you mainly had services like chat rooms, email, and the ability to browse certain sites. When you logged into your Prodigy account any email you had received would automatically be downloaded to a temporary folder on your computer along with any attachments to those emails. If someone you didn't even know had sent you email (which was easy to do since anyone in any chat room could simply right click on your name and send you an IM or an email) had sent you an email with CP images attached then those images were moved to your computer as soon as you opened your account. Of course you didn't KNOW this at the time unless you were knowledgeable of the inner-workings of the Prodigy service (which you typically would not be unless you did a LOT of research and had some reason to want to know - such as after you had been indicted or something). Obviously with something like email you would typically open all of the emails you receive and would read them, so if someone had sent you an email with CP images attached you would see them, right? WRONG - the problem was that because you were so inundated with trolls who simply hung out in these chat rooms and would send you so many unsolicited emails you often would simply trash any whose sender that you didn't recognize not realize that even though you moved them to your trash they still existed on your hard drive.
In my case these trolls had sent a lot of emails and many of them had 3 images attached. There were something like 40-60 images that were in my attachments and the government claimed that 4 to 6 of them "contained images of people who APPEARED to be below the age of 18 engaged in some form of lewd or lascivious act," which at the time was all that had to exist in order to be considered CP. I was told that even if we could prove that a) I NEVER asked anyone for ANY image to be sent to me, b) I NEVER looked at those images, and c) the people in the images WERE in fact over the age of 18, that I could STILL be convicted of possession of CP! EVEN if they people in the images were CLOTHED!
I was like WTF kind of shit is that???? Bottom line - if they WANTED to convict you of possession of CP back then they WOULD convict you! There are MANY people sitting in federal prison today who had similar cases - many will die there.
In 2005 the SCOTUS ruled that the federal statute was unconstitutionally over broad with respect to the "appears to be below the age of 18" language. This changed the landscape considerably. However, with newer technologies such as Limewire (which I personally have never even seen, and from what it sounds like I'm lucky that I haven't) you can still be sent videos and images that you a) didn't request, b) didn't view, and c) don't even know are there.
So even today if you end up for whatever reason as the subject of an investigation by state or federal authorities you can easily be found to be in possession of CP. This is one of the scariest situations that exists IMO in our country.
There is a chance for a waiver on the time limit. I'm desperate . I've requested a waiver and tell them why.. because my son was basically framed by the feds. He didn't do anything but delete some accidentally downloaded cps. We have proof. The judge and prosecutor knew my son did it by accident but they made a lesson of him, as the prosecutor said that they can't look like they're easy on these laws. So, a pardon may not be everyone. If my son did something or if they tell me that they won't give him one when I send in my papers (and I have a folder full of stuff, nicely organized) then I'll try it again next year. and the year after.
Until I can find an attorney in PA who can help me prove that his confession was coerced, which is obvious when you see the forensics which disproved his confession.. this is my only hope right now.
The Feds said my son had 2319 'suspect' cps, when they were looking at 2316 music videos and 2 cp that my son never saw and never opened. They one they said they found him with was not found on the computer even after 3 forensics studies was done on it. . so I wonder. I've seen a story of another young man where they couldn't find the initial cp they said was on his either.
I don't know how they can charge our men with stuff they didn't find. My son wasn't charged with that one but they used it. as it had a 3 y.o. in it along with the description in detail of what was in that cp. It was in every single piece of their litigation. I was in the plea bargain, seach warrant, psi and in sentencing, yet that 1 cp wasn't found nor was he charged on that particular one.
Our attorney asked that the description and info on that cp was taken out because it looked bad and it wasn't relevant to the case but the proscutor said no and that if we kept asking about it they would just up charged and go to trial. Not like we had a choice. But when anyone sees his paperwork it looks really bad with that in it plus his 'confession'.
They charged him 1 count for he Vicky series which is everywhere.. and old series which will never go away because there are thousands of copies of that series. But they get away with it because they're saving the children.