Thank you.

Thank you Gwen! Psycho-therapy (which I can't afford) is in depth, and it's purpose is to release the unconscious contents of the patient. It's taken me a long time to express my feelings, and 'analyze' them. My answer to your question yesterday I answered in a long dissertation, but there were some things that I didn't get to say because I thought about them later. I can see now a repetition of an aid that I've used successfully before to break some of my addictions: ANGER. It's how I stopped chewing tobacco, and drinking alcohol. My angry tone in my answer yesterday helps me admit how I really feel without editing it for anyone else. Thanks for pissing me off with your question, it allowed me to say what I really wanted to say, even if it was slighly inacurate. So here is an annotation to that outburst, how I feel the history of who I am plays out. Look at my Avatar, that cute little 5 year old. What a handsome cutie! However, there is a 'problem' with this attractive little boy. He is shy. He is shy by nature. Extremely sensitive to potential threats, both physical and emotional. It has been observed that extraverted mothers prefer extraverted sons, it may also be introverted mothers, but the association is there. Sensitive sons are not what women want, they want future MEN, in the man-ly sense, who can protect and defend according to society's and the culture's needs and expectations. This observation is not 100% inclusive, or absolute, but it is notable in the behavior of mothers; it's also natural for them. They too see how shy people are treated in society and do not want their 'pride and joy' to be like that. Perhaps it's even a reflection upon the ego of the mother. Like attracts like. When an extraverted, over-bearing, forceful mother has a shy son, then she immediately believes something is wrong with the child and that the shyness needs to be 'corrected', it's a flaw, it's something she doesn't want. The shyness is rejected. How could she, the Great Extravert, have a shy, introverted child? Something is wrong! The baby is supposed to be like her. There's been some error! She must do something to correct this 'problem' that she percieves. At least that's how I presume it works. You ask who, besides me, is asking me to change. Almost everyone. Not directly, no one comes up and says "Why don't you change?" There's nothing that obvious, it's implied. The fact that I don't want to socialize until I feel safe about my environment is viewed as 'stand-offish. I am more extraverted here on DS because I feel safe with my short list of friends, who I know and trust to not attack or belittle my feelings. You have to admit, I have some strange feelings; and they can disturb some people who are not as accepting. That's why I don't often engage in the discussion groups. It seems my depth of thought has some details in processing my conclusions that I leave out for the sake of brevity. I tend to skip over some needed principles in order to say what I want to say. Or something like that. Details are important to 'shy' people, and HSP's. We look for threats everywhere until we're reasonably certain of safety, at least for our concept of safety. So here's the deal, based on the background above (true and accurate, or not), from my recollection and feelings. When you are young and 'shy' (apprehensive), the first thing you are told is "Don't be SHY". In other words, don't be who you are, be something else. "Who you naturally are isn't good"; "It's a bad thing to be SHY". "WE need to correct this", "you'll get over it eventually". "Don't feel afraid, or be shy!" (which is similar to saying "Don't trust your feelings, trust someone else's". "Your feelings aren't accurate, there's something 'wrong' with them; you're not feeing things the way the rest of US are feeling them.")  "You're different, and that's BAD!" It's a bad thing to be different. Those seem to be the things I heard about myself growing up. That there was something wrong with me, I wasn't like the 'others', and that's bad. I am (my feelings) the cause of hurting other's feelings. I have a direct effect/affect on other people's feelings and I need to be careful to stop doing that. I need to watch everything I do so I do not trouble other's feelings. Who I am bothers other people. I'm not supposed to be me, I'm suppose to be someone else. There's a fatal flaw in me. I'm a bother, and need to be corrected. And, to be quite honest, it turns out it is true. My quite introspective self does bother other people, the most of which are not quiet and introspective. They tend to be involved in the superficialities of life, I'm not. Many people, especially the 'herding', social, extraverts, by their nature cannot handle differentness or anomolies. By their nature they prefer the sameness of their tribal similarities for safety. Strangness disturbs them as much as it does shy people; the difference being that shy people are typically not psychosocial, they're independent; in thought and action. They're not 'joiners', they have a preference for their own thoughts and their own self. It is only narcissistic when compared to the dominant culture and the majority. In a culture of introverts, an extravert would be considered an outcast, an ADHD type, that needs to sit down, be quite, and not engage with everyone or anyone unless there's something important to say or learn. So that's the LONG answer. I am different by nature an chastized for it. I'm considered odd by culture I live in and have yet to find a place that I can florish in at being myself (if such a place actually exists). Thanks for bringing this out in me. I've ben wanting to say it for a long long time. Hugs to all, Rich

Replies

mgs1
mgs1

This is good dialog. Flawed - in my opinion - but good dialog.
Here is what I see. The brain is nothing more than a computer.
Since you like data and analysis, you soak \'everything\' in - to a fault.
So what your parents, said don\'t be shy. What they should have said was,
These kids are just like you and might be a little timid, so if they aren\'t so friendly at first, they will be as soon as they get to know you. Research shows your brain registers whatever it hears and then you associate an emotion or feeling with it. Here is an example.. when 600 children were told,
\"don\'t spill your milk\" 85% of the spilled their milk. When 600 children were told, there\'s alot of liquid in your cup, but your a big boy (or girl) and your can handle it... 85% of them didn\'t spill their milk. It doesn\'t matter whether it is negative or positive, your brain registers it and produces an action or emotion.
I still believe to this day, that is what you continue to do - program your brain negatively because you are most comfortable when you are angry. Honesty, this is an observation. My perception is... you are\'t shy. You lack self-confidence. The more you tell yourself you ar
mgs1
mgs1

e shy, the more stuck you become. The study of the spilled milk is nothing more then quantum physics. You are what you label yourself. The problem is, YOU label yourself what you think others label you - which I don\'t think is true. I think you like to analyze things because you think it makes you appear smart. I can tell you trying to appear smart is going to get more negative reaction from people, then remaining silent until you feel comfortable about your surroundings. You start to feel comfortable with your environment as soon as you are comfortable with yourself.
deleted_user
deleted_user

I for one, do not think there is anything wrong with being an introvert.
Richeart
Richeart

MGS1, your last line is telling, and important. I experience life according to my perceptions. I just read Victor Frankl\'s \"Man\'s Search for Meaning\" and it helped. The more I search for what\'s wrong with me the more I find! But as your sentence says, I am still not comfortable with myself. I use my environment as an excuse for how I feel about myself, and how I feel about myself is based on my beliefs about myself, and where I got those beliefs may have come from such an experience in childhood that I continue to apply to myself as my \"I AM\".

There seems to be a great disparity between how I see myself and how others see me. That \'lack of self confidence\' is directly related to the self in conjunction with the environment. Is it genetic or learned? And no matter, can it be changed? As in adpted to. If it is uncomfortable for me, it is up to me to change it, since it\'s a feeling and all feelings are created inside, it is something I need to stop expecting my enviroment to change in order to make it more comfortable, and take responsibility to change myself.

You\'re right about another thing, my constant negativity. I think the shyness may be causing that, or the negativity may be causing the shyness. I may have to invoke Frankl\'s \"anticipatory anxiety\" concept, or learn to to be attached to the outcome of things so tightly. STUCK and LABEL are stil good words for this conversation. There\'s something about positive thinking that involves expectations and my expectation are either habitually inaccurate or something else, I have beeb disappointed so often with my expectations that I anticipate their lack of fruition so that I anticipate anxiety and failure. Let me see what I can do to change it. Thanks.
Richeart
Richeart

That should read \"Not\" attached to an outcome of things so tightly.

How can I be positive without expectations of positive results? Or is it that whatever happens I\'m to have faith in as being positive. I am a detailed person, I automatically think and feel in terms of details. How can I learn not to be concerned about details when that is part of my makeup, as far as I know? Or is it another perfectionistic trait? I think it is part of my inherent nature to be detailed; sensitive. That\'s what we HSP\'s do; we\'re extremely attentive to details and interpretations to our environment. To change that would be to change my core self. Lowering my standards and scaling would be a possible tactic, if it were possible. The question remains how I can be positive, feel positive, without detailing the results I seek or expect. Details matter to me, my desires are often detailed. So all you\'re saying is that they\'re TOO detailed...

I donno, my head is spinning. My mind cannot grasp the concept yet. It\'s still the dichotomous thinking. If you didn\'t get what you were thinking positive about, your positive thinking failed; pure and simple. I expect negativity just from experiences of positive thinking.
Richeart
Richeart

No! Gwen. I do not program my brain to think negatively, it was done for me, as you say. The words I heard were to not be myself, and don\'t trust others; who I am disturbs others and it\'s my fault they\'re disturbed. That programming is what needs to be changed, you\'re right! But I\'m not willfully doing it, it\'s part of my early programming and is set in place by strong emoti9ons, like you say.


This is psycho-analysis. This is how it works. The feelings I have kept from others, AND myself, need to be expressed out loud, so I can see them, bring my unconscious to consciousness, so I can deal with it. As yet, I have not been able to change that core belief. It will take some deep meditation and effort to change a life-long habit. It CAN be done, and I CAN do it. It\'s just How, When, and Where. Or can I do it with what I just learned today in reading Victor Frankl\'s book on Logotherapy, and \"redeflecting\" with negative thoughts to overcome phobias? Reverse psychology; deem to, expect, and desire negativity, and the over-focus will insure it doesn\'t happen, the opposite will. As you say, anticipatory anxiety insures the event will happen; over-focusing on it will insure it won\'t happen. I\'ll see what I can do. Think negative, on purpose; and then be satisfied when the negative event doesn\'t happen and a positive one does.