Wrongful Conviction/ Injustice Community Group
For people and families who have tasted or advocate against the horrors of injustice
Low Level Drug Offenders in Prison----A Different
rewdiazepam
I am placing this here because injustice come in all shapes or colors. When we think of an injustice, we usually think of an innocent person in prison, but an injustice can also be when any person who should not be in prison, finds himself locked up without any hope for rehabilitation.
I am speaking of the prison sentences for low level drug offenders, the possessors and the users.
In my work, I realize that many of the wives, mothers, and girlfriends have a husband, son/daughter, or boyfriend serving time in prison for low level drug offenses, a substance abuse problem, or alcohol related charges.
Many wonder why this happens and why more is not being done to correct the problem of so many low level offenders serving time in the our nation's penitentiaries.
The American criminal justice system will always be burdened down with these arrests and prison terms of low level offenders UNTIL---until--- we realize---REALIZE---- that drug abuse, substance abuse, and alcohol abuse is a MEDICAL problem and NOT a criminal justice system problem.
Not only have we thrown billions of dollars down the bottomless pit of state or federal corrections with nothing to show for it, the amount of misery for the family when a low level offender is imprisoned, with the resultant felony conviction----which drastically changes the offender's lives----is immeasurable and cannot be overstated.
The people who work on the front lines and the families of those with these types of offenders in prison can attest to the emotional drain and heartache it is to have a loved one in prison.
Unless the offender was dealing large amounts of drugs for profit, he or she needs help, not prison. In all the prisons I was ever housed or all the prisons I knew, the rehabilitation of the offender was never a priority.
Oh, they might have some rinky dink three month program taught by a case manager, but no concerted effort was made to really rehabilitate these NON-violent offenders. Why spend the limited resources to help the offenders when the same money could be used to enhance a political agenda of being "tough on crime" which continues to be a sure ticket for our politicians to be re-elected?
Politicians do not win elections because they are humanitarians or because they are "smart on crime" but because they are able to appease the uninformed masses that the hard on crime attitude is the best solution to the problem.
We should have learned long ago that, in this foolish War on Drugs, we cannot ARREST our way out of this problem. But we didn't.
I was in the drug industry, as that is the field for which I was educated. I saw the day in day out number of people who were addicted---either physically addicted or psychologically addicted (sometimes referred to as "habituated") to controlled substances---- and did not even realize it. As the drugs became easier to obtain and more difficult to manage----as in the case of the opiates----the problem spread to out youth.
We failed to educated them about drugs, but we also failed to offer them any viable medical treatment. All we had to offer was scorn and to label them as "a drug addict." That is not an effective method to approach any substance abuse problem, especially the one we have in American at the present time.
And therein is the problem. Stupid politicians and an uninformed public that does not understand----and most of the time, does not care---about the real problems that plague this nation.
As I said, for several decades we have attempted to arrest our way out of this problem with no success. To continue on this same path is nothing short of stubborn foolishness.
rewdiazepam
I am speaking of the prison sentences for low level drug offenders, the possessors and the users.
In my work, I realize that many of the wives, mothers, and girlfriends have a husband, son/daughter, or boyfriend serving time in prison for low level drug offenses, a substance abuse problem, or alcohol related charges.
Many wonder why this happens and why more is not being done to correct the problem of so many low level offenders serving time in the our nation's penitentiaries.
The American criminal justice system will always be burdened down with these arrests and prison terms of low level offenders UNTIL---until--- we realize---REALIZE---- that drug abuse, substance abuse, and alcohol abuse is a MEDICAL problem and NOT a criminal justice system problem.
Not only have we thrown billions of dollars down the bottomless pit of state or federal corrections with nothing to show for it, the amount of misery for the family when a low level offender is imprisoned, with the resultant felony conviction----which drastically changes the offender's lives----is immeasurable and cannot be overstated.
The people who work on the front lines and the families of those with these types of offenders in prison can attest to the emotional drain and heartache it is to have a loved one in prison.
Unless the offender was dealing large amounts of drugs for profit, he or she needs help, not prison. In all the prisons I was ever housed or all the prisons I knew, the rehabilitation of the offender was never a priority.
Oh, they might have some rinky dink three month program taught by a case manager, but no concerted effort was made to really rehabilitate these NON-violent offenders. Why spend the limited resources to help the offenders when the same money could be used to enhance a political agenda of being "tough on crime" which continues to be a sure ticket for our politicians to be re-elected?
Politicians do not win elections because they are humanitarians or because they are "smart on crime" but because they are able to appease the uninformed masses that the hard on crime attitude is the best solution to the problem.
We should have learned long ago that, in this foolish War on Drugs, we cannot ARREST our way out of this problem. But we didn't.
I was in the drug industry, as that is the field for which I was educated. I saw the day in day out number of people who were addicted---either physically addicted or psychologically addicted (sometimes referred to as "habituated") to controlled substances---- and did not even realize it. As the drugs became easier to obtain and more difficult to manage----as in the case of the opiates----the problem spread to out youth.
We failed to educated them about drugs, but we also failed to offer them any viable medical treatment. All we had to offer was scorn and to label them as "a drug addict." That is not an effective method to approach any substance abuse problem, especially the one we have in American at the present time.
And therein is the problem. Stupid politicians and an uninformed public that does not understand----and most of the time, does not care---about the real problems that plague this nation.
As I said, for several decades we have attempted to arrest our way out of this problem with no success. To continue on this same path is nothing short of stubborn foolishness.
rewdiazepam
Posts You May Be Interested In
-
Which explains the mysterious fevers and my extra fatigue. I'm so glad I pushed for answers.
-
Due to my increased paranoia, anxiety, and a panic attack over the weekend, my psychiatrist has put me back in a full dose of Zyprexa until further notice. Every time I think I'm getting ahead something happens and it's back to square one. I knew he was gonna do this but I can't help feeling disappointed. It is what it is.

The science behind addiction is clear, we just choose to ignore it.
I have seen more and more of the dangers of the way our system uses law enforcement rather than medicine to work with the people who are caught in the middle of the "take this to feel better" method of handling problems.
Watching a federal contractor working with people with different ability levels and drug and alcohol conditions, anger conditions, conviction conditions, and knowing the laws and restrictions working in federal locations, made for a very difficult work place for those who supervised or worked alongside these individuals. Whenever a problem occurred that had negative consequences, those same individuals were the ones penalized. Applying this to the "arrest" system, it is similar with the same results, increasing of numbers, zero success in reducing the situations of "arrest".
Had a supervisor bring a cooler of prohibited "alcohol" into the work place...however, the supervisor then placed the prohibited "alcohol" into a co-workers cooler and only because the co-worker stepped into the room did the situation get resolved immediately. The alcohol was put back into the supervisor's personal vehicle, the co-worker took their cooler to their personal vehicle, and the incident was written up after the supervisor left the workplace at the end of the work day. Another time, the same supervisor put three individuals into a situation where drugs were available in the workplace, and the next day when random employees were called in for drug tests, all three were on the list. All three were fired, with a six month hold before they could be re-hired (this is one of the rules for the federal contractor to have the federal contract). The federal contractor was finally removed from the list in one area only AFTER several investigations were completed when individuals were forced to resign or terminated revealed their evidence in a safe location off-site. Some of these individuals have since found employment elsewhere, and others were hired into the federal system, but the individuals all have changed their work habits, their views, and their lifestyles due to this situation.
Those individuals who were fired for drug...no such help anywhere. They were labeled for their conditions, and those same conditions were used to terminate their employment without any recourse, other than the individuals who spoke up. It didn't change anything for them, except to fail them where it was supposed to teach them skills to manage their conditions.
Yes, I agree "arrest" does not work.
I'm sure the centres are already built and they could be made minimum security with at least some staff that's trained in addictions.... I'm sure a lot of people would come out to help this type of facility 'make it'
They could look for peer support that would come in... 12 Step Programs for those who would be interested in it and aftercare programs that would be available in the community
A lot of people who do become sober are quite often interested helping in this field in the form of 'paying it back'
To start they would just have to take facilities that are mixed with prisoners with different types of crimes and sort them out... I would love to see sick people helped and become productive members of society unfortunately there are many who still stigmatize addiciton
You are correct that for some people, the only way to get them to stop using drugs is to send them to prison. But then what? They receive no help in prison at all and are ultimately doomed to return to drugs when they are released.
There are 19 state-owned prisons in Oklahoma, plus 6 community corrections centers, plus 15 community work centers, plus 6 privately owned prisons. That is 46 places in Oklahoma to lock people up. And that does not even count the 77 county jails that are bursting at the seams.
http://tinyurl.com/mguegko
Have you ever looked on the map and seen the size of Oklahoma? Well, it is not a large state and it is not highly populated. Forty six prisons seems like a lot to me.
It seems as if it would be much better to clear out four or five of these prisons and make them nothing but substance rehab centers. Why not? Why can't a prison be converted to a medical rehab center? The inmates would still be confined but they would get treatment.
At least this way the taxpayer would at least be getting something for the approximately $30,000 a year it costs to house one offender for one year. As it is now, with a revolving door policy, the tax dollars are completely wasted.
I suppose that would be too sensible.
rewdiazepam
Thing is, is that although effective, these soft-on-crime approaches, aren't popular.
When my son was having extreme issues (got suspended from kindergarten), I was advised by the school to get tougher on him.
On the other hand, the first thing that the therapist we took him to said to me....was that I was being too hard on him.
Eventually I decided that I didn't give a damn what the school thought, I loved my son, and decided that the most important thing would ever be my relationship with him. And that's when I dropped most (not all, but most) of the behavioral modification type things I'd been doing with him. "Punishments" got toned down to very minimal, very quick, and very short. It took about 6 months, but the issues dropped dramatically.
My son is in high school now, and is pretty much a dream child. I never have to ask about homework, he's in gifted classes, gets good grades, he's got good friends, he cuts the grass, takes out the garbage, helps clean bathrooms, etc, etc. I trust him to ride his bike on the busy roads all on his own (he's got a road certified bike helmet and bike lights for night riding...).
All of that is great to brag about.....but in many ways also doesn't matter. What matters is....he's close to me. I check on him at night and get him water. He checks on me and gets me tea. That attachment is worth 1000 times more than anything else.
And I think that a lot of people who's life was changed through treatment would be willing to give back through volunteering.. It could work much like the 12 Step Program without a faith attached as 12 Steps is there as well
Many people who suffer from addiction want to give back to those in need and I think peer support would be readily available
I think there needs to be consequences in life however I always believe that they should be tempered with love
I'm glad you found a system that provided both the boundaries and the exploration together. It makes a huge impact on their future, as well as ours.
Tea made by someone who cares always tastes delicious!