Rheumatoid Arthritis Support Group
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem, autoimmune disorder. It is a disabling and painful condition which can lead to substantial loss of mobility due to pain and joint destruction. The disease is also systemic in that it often also affects many extra-articular tissues throughout the body including the skin, blood vessels, heart, lungs, and...
My question is this - has your doctor shared with you what the sub-results are from the test? Not just your overall score, but what your individual protein markers are? Are they recommending a change in your treatment on the basis of the protein markers measured, or because you're not responding to Actemra? It's possible that you should be trying another TNF blocker (ie, any other biologic other than Actemra), especially if you do not overproduce IL-6, which is what Actemra treats. You may do better on infusions than taking tablets, especially given the experience you had on Arava.
I hope this is helpful and that you're able to have a good conversation with your rheumy.
* No biologic targeting TNF ever worked for me, and I've had this disease for about 14 years now. No doctor could explain why; we just kept trying one med after another.
* Actemra, the only biologic that inhibits IL-6, was the last on the list of things for me to try. To get to it, I had to try and presumably fail 2 more biologics over a six-month period, which means it would have taken me a year to get an IL-6 inhibitor if it were not for the Vectra-DA test.
* The Vectra test's individual biomarker levels were *interpreted by my rheumatologist*, not Crescendo, the maker of the test. This may be an important distinction to make here - that a qualified practitioner made the assessment himself, though I should point out that I saw a copy of the results and I could see for myself that they clearly showed the overproduction of IL-6 proteins vs TNF and other inflammatory markers percentage-wise. In that sense it's like routine lab work that isn't interpreted by the laboratory that tested you either; your doctor does that along with other tests and observations. Crescendo themselves emailed me that the physician receives the breakdown of the biomarkers along with the overall score, and I think it can't hurt you to ask about that breakdown (btw, I'm not affiliated with Crescendo in any way and have nothing to gain by sharing my personal experience).
* The change from Remicade to Actemra was the first drug (other than prednisone) that significantly eased my pain, slowed the progression of my disease, restored much of my energy and allowed me to resume hiking and jogging for the first time in many years. I won't add anything to this discussion beyond that - getting that relief one year sooner based on that test made all the difference for me.
Sunshine, I hope that whatever treatment you and your doctor decide on is right for you and gives you the pain relief and restored function you need to feel well.
In the past 2 1/2 years I've had both knees replaced, rotator cuff repair with debridement and most recently cervical fusion. I still have erosion going on, so that is why my Rheumy wants to change to Xeljanz.
I have had RA for 24 years and now it is in the state of high activity and I am running out of options. I either am allergic to the med or it quits working. With Xeljanz being so new and the last thing to try for now I was just wondering about the side effects and how others have responded to it.
I'm glad it has done well for you. I hope it continues to work for you.
Thank you to both of you for your input. I appreciate it very much.