Hepatitis C Support Group
Hepatitis C is a blood-borne viral disease which can cause liver inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver cancer. The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is spread by blood-to-blood contact with an infected person's blood. Many people with HCV infection have no symptoms and are unaware of the need to seek treatment. Hepatitis C infects an estimated 150-200 million people worldwide.
That IMO is the *most* important question to be asked until it's no longer necessary.
Hi Brigid. :-)
You can search on the www as I do. Takes a little time but worth it.
Here is one for you
http://www.hepatitiscnewdrugresearch.com/gs-7977-formally-psi-7977.html
I would take it again but no way Jose to Interferon.
Check this site too
http://www.hepatitiscnewdrugresearch.com/gs-7977-formally-psi-7977.html
http://hcvadvocate.blogspot.ca/p/interferon-free.html
THAT'S the question I'd really like answered. I'd take Riba if I had to, but I worry about kidney side effects. Gilead is testing the sofosbuvir/gs-5885 combo with and without Riba, and I've read on one of the forums that some Gilead reps are saying "off the record" that ribavirin won't even be needed. On the other hand, I've read some posts by skeptics who feel that riba will be always needed for genotype 1, at least
One thing that I'm kind of fixated on, in spite of my concerns about Riba, is that Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin alone cleared 84% of treatment-naive genotype 1 in a recent trial. I'm genotype 1a, and since Sofosbuvir should be out early next year at the latest (I hope), there's part of me that would like to take the chance of trying that route with Riba and clearing the virus as soon as possible. Maybe I should wait for better odds and less side effects though, and be extra safe with my sketchy kidneys. Anyway, I totally understand where you're coming from. Let's keep an eye on the news.
My issue is that I have pretty advanced fibrosis, so I can't wait too long (If one trusts the fibrosure.) but I really would like to avoid it.