Families of SOs Community Group
WE HAVE MOVED!!! ............................. ............................... ......................... ............................ ............................. .......................... HERE: http://support-for-families.boards.net ............. ................ ............... ................ ............................... .................Please create a profile...
Since the mid-1990's states have allowed, and in certain instances required, castration as a way of penalizing sexual offenders or as a condition to their release from custody. Table 1 shows castration laws by state.
Table 1: Castration Laws by State:( see https://www.cga.ct.gov/2006/rpt/2006-R-0183.htm for table and complete report)
"Proponents of castration argue that it is justified and appropriate. Specifically, they argue that using castration to control sex offenders' irresistible urges to rape or molest again allows them to be released without endangering the public.
Opponents argue that the side effects of chemical castration (e.g., life threatening blood clots and serious allergic reactions) are reason for avoiding it. Others have argued unsuccessfully that forced castration violates the protection against cruel and unusual punishment guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution."
Sounds like a job for Prison guards at Abu Grebe (or maybe for the "psychiatrists in the CIA NON-Torture torture program?
BTW these are the states currently using this "method" Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Oregon, Montana, and Wisconsin followed California's lead and now allow treatment as punishment for certain sexual offenses. Florida, like California, makes treatment mandatory for repeat offenders. In all of these states treatment is a condition of release from custody and generally starts before the offender is released. In Louisiana, treatment is also a condition of sentence reduction or suspension.