Why FFA Submissions and Link Park Are a Bad Idea

Before search-engines got smart, a site's site rating was centered on keyword match-ups. The incorrect sites were getting too much attention, when webmasters stock-piled their sites with key words. Google chose to give attention to a site's 'acceptance' rather. How many incoming links became the focus of PR criteria. The idea behind this method was that if a great deal of websites connect to yet another site, that site could contain important information. But again, webmasters got sneaky. With this development, we began to begin to see the evolution of 'Link Farms' and 'Free-for-All' (FFA) websites. These pages were essentially a collection of (often-times) useless links. Generally, the sites were not grouped or descriptive. This cogent http://www.feedbooks.com/user/1648040/profile article has oodles of elegant cautions for the inner workings of this idea. They became a place for webmasters to eliminate their links as a way to make their site appear very popular. This strategy worked for some time, but soon se's caught on. 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites served no purpose to web users. Because Google prides itself o-n catering to users (and NOT developers), a remedy needed to be produced. 'Link Farms' were filling up the internet and rendering it more difficult for customers to locate valuable resources online. Google soon started to rate the quality of the links that identified a site's 'link pop.' 'Link Farms' and FFA sites became classified as junk, and ergo added no importance to your site's link popularity. Today, submitting to some 'Link Farm' or FFA site can be harmful to your website's name. Google requires a strong position against these kinds of link pages. At best, the 'Link Farm' will get down your rating and make it harder for the important internet sites to work-in your favor. At worst, your website will be BANNED completely for using spam sites to attempt to generate traffic. If you choose to be taught further on http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/syrialamb81vhk/journal/view/id/5616040cca16b4045809ca12 , there are heaps of databases you might think about investigating. Identify supplementary resources on http://www.purevolume.com/waiterlake6/posts/11362284/Heave+Web+Value+by+SEO+ by browsing our great article directory. This can be a very real possibility. 'Link Farms' and FFA web sites provide hardly any value. Quality or relevant links will not be obtained by users from your distribution, although it may possibly seem appealing. Plus, who would like to see their link among 'trash' sites for adult entertainment, online dating sites, and casinos? Posting to 'Link Farms' does not subscribe to your standing and is just not worth the risk. Alternatively, spend your time submitting to legitimate directories and exchanging links with other relevant sites. The process can be time-consuming, however it may be the only way to create safe, site-specific traffic. For an easier solution to the boring listing distribution process, and to Submit your site to 300+ link sites fast and easy Directory Submitter is recommended by us..