My Difficulties With Wp Styles

SEnuke: Ready for action

It all started in the late 90's. Visit John Kopp's Levelling Guide-Is I-t Any Good? Discover First! \u00ab Meal Marimba1k9 to learn how to acknowledge this hypothesis. I desired to put some news o-n my internet site. A record. A listing of future events. I began with simple HTML. One page, with sections for each and every post. Simple.

Then I heard about 'websites' and 'blogging.' Being wise, I picked Word-press, the most popular software. How clever, I thought. Anyone could put up a web site, should you get the WYSIWYG editor going. Be taught new information on this affiliated portfolio - Hit this web site: www.houzz.com/pro/brianladin/brian-ladin/. Very democratic. In case you desire to learn more about Asbestos Killed my Husband, there are lots of online libraries people might think about investigating.

This encouraged my to post my outermost thoughts; o-n London, politics, and personal gripes. As a web-master, I watched to see Google index them. 'Here we go', I thought, 'soon, my treasures of extrospection may fit in with the ages.'

Except Google didn't like my website. It would not index much beyond the leading page. Why, why, why?

Replicate material? I set it to place just one post per-page.

No progress.

I looked over what Google was indexing. Then I looked at the HTML. Soon, all became clear.

In sum:

- Word-press was still duplicating my content, and

- It'd no right META-TAGS, and

- There was a great deal unnecessary HTML, and

- The layout obscured this content.

I had a fast search on Google to get search engine optimisation ideas. To get a different viewpoint, please consider looking at: save on. There's a plug-in 'head-meta explanation' ( http://guff.szub.net/plugins/ ). But I did not use that, oh no.

For some reason, I got the notion that a full topic is the ticket. I tried modifying an existing one myself. Better, but not great. Google was needs to list more pages, but they all had the same name. My missives to an uncaring world were being overlooked.

So I got another person to complete one, centered on my standards, which were:

- Grab a META 'concept' from the post 'title';

- Grab a META 'explanation' from your blog 'excerpts';

- Put a ROBOTS 'noindex' draw in non-content pages.

But that wasn't enough. For best SEO results you need to manage Wordpress savagely. You've to be _mean_ to it. You have to _man_ enough.

I did so a little of re-search and created to following guidelines.

WARNING: They're serious. Making major changes to-your URLs may influence them, In the event that you already have great ranks. Within my case:

- Moving my website http://www.ttblog.co.uk for the root web listing,

- MOD_REWRITING its URLs, and

- Removing a 30-1 redirect,

... caused my PageRank to go to 0. BUT, page indexing was unchanged.

This is temporary, as Google found it as 'suspect' behavior. I'd drastically changed my site.

Here are the recommendations, for real _men_, who can try looking in the face of web death and laugh:

1. Activate permalinks by going to 'Options/Permalinks.' You could have allow Apache MOD_REWRITE on your own web account.

1a. Limit the code to just the variable. Don't bother with the time codes. This keeps your URLs short.

2. Position your site within the index possible. http://www.ttblog.co.uk is preferable to http://www.ttblog.co.uk/wordpress/

So a normal post would seem like

http://www.ttblog.co.uk/Im-hard-as-nails-me/

rather than

http://www.ttblog.co.uk/wordpress/2006/08/03/Im-hard-as-nails-me/

3. Then install an SEO'd theme.

My blogs are now being found beautifully. The Google 'site:' command returns all my threads, and little else.

For my next concern, I accept Windows XP, and turn it into an os..