Brenda's Nude Photograph by Professional Shutterbug, Her Former Boyfriend
One of the greatest irritants between us has been a photograph of Brenda secretly taken while we were married by a former boyfriend of hers, a professional photographer. It is not a "pornographic" photo. It is in very good taste, and her face is not visible, and it has been airbrushed, too, removing tell-tale marks which someone (me) might recognize as belonging to her. Oh, lest I forget this small detail: it is a nude photograph.
Brenda does not know that I know the photograph is of her; she kept it secret; and she has never mentioned it to me, and I only discovered the proof of the identity of the model 10 years after I was initially shown the book that contained the photograph. I shall speak of this problem in more detail in a future journal entry.
Before closing, let me add that it begs the question to call the shutterbug a "former" boyfriend. In fact, I don't believe he really ever was; I believe she regularly visited him or at least kept in touch, which doesn't mean that they had sex together. That's a point for another journal entry.
Brenda does not know that I know the photograph is of her; she kept it secret; and she has never mentioned it to me, and I only discovered the proof of the identity of the model 10 years after I was initially shown the book that contained the photograph. I shall speak of this problem in more detail in a future journal entry.
Before closing, let me add that it begs the question to call the shutterbug a "former" boyfriend. In fact, I don't believe he really ever was; I believe she regularly visited him or at least kept in touch, which doesn't mean that they had sex together. That's a point for another journal entry.
Replies