Well my finances were corrected. I have to be open-minded to the best procedure to read law and legal enterprise. I don't want to talk about God's ultimate pressure for me to help this system and his people.
Major pressure, however the pressure is checked with massive support. I've always been provided the re-re-reinforcement and support necessary to win. I've always been very appreciative of the help, it's a lot of love and has been known to create a flow of emotion.
It's only right for me to study this man Christ. The key is my understanding that I will always be the opposite of Christ, and it's ok.
I actually don't have anything to say this morning in a good way. I don't feel compelled to voice any opinion, am accepting that I have to do the work most aren't doing or can do, and that is alright too.
Are there any defects at play silently? There is a bit of dishonesty with the finances corrected. I'm thinking I can just throw it kind of, but to throw is to throw away, and the Christ man is saying "throw it away" and I'm saying, "Don't you wish."
Seriously though, there are some great College Football games on today. If Iowa and Clemson loses the CFP is fucked. Each team has great arguments why they should be in the top four. Clemson will only have one lose to a top ten ranked opponent, Bama had one bad game to a good team and kicked ass the rest of the way, Oklahoma has three straight victories over teams that were at one time in the top ten, Iowa will have one loss to a team that beat a top ranked team, and also has beaten a number of other top tier teams, Michigan State, the team I just spoke of in relation to Iowa, if they beat Iowa should be a lock, except for a weak loss to Nebraska that could be a huge factor. Ohio State had one bad game, losing to Michigan State, and also has a good argument if not a better argument than Bama since the Big Ten was just as good as the SEC in many ways this year. I'll stop there, because if you have two losses, you should not even be considered. Here is the thing, what if UNC blows Clemson out? If UNC blows Clemson out, that should be enough to put them in a playoff as one of the best teams. Here is my proposal. Do it like the NFL does, have the first weekend with four teams, 3 through 6, 3 plays 6, and 4 plays 5, then 1 and 2 get byes, then it's loser goes home after that.
Nobody is really talking about a six team playoff. Six teams would at least eliminate the two loss teams, if you've lost two games you aren't a Champion.
Sorry that was inconsiderate, I mean for practical purposes, there is no reason why a two loss team should be ahead of a one loss team, strength of schedule or not, "you play to win the game", like Herm Edwards said. You don't play to lose but have a good showing against strong teams in your schedule, you play to win, and if you lose, but then get rewarded like a winner, that's some kindergarten bullshit that makes us all more sissy's. What does that say about hard work, building dynasty's? Do you think Bama and Saban didn't work harder when they lost to Ole Miss? Clearly they worked harder and saw the liability of loss because they've been ass-whooping ever since. I'm hoping UNC blows Clemson out, and Michigan State runs the table on Iowa, because then there are six great arguments for six great teams, but unfortunately two are going to get screwed, and I bet it won't be Bama or Oklahoma. Even though Bama lost pathetically to Ole Miss and Oklahoma should have lost to TCU a few weeks ago. I'd be the most pissed if I were OSU, those guys lost by a measly three points to a very good team, yet they probably will be passed over if it comes down to it.
Anyway.
Major pressure, however the pressure is checked with massive support. I've always been provided the re-re-reinforcement and support necessary to win. I've always been very appreciative of the help, it's a lot of love and has been known to create a flow of emotion.
It's only right for me to study this man Christ. The key is my understanding that I will always be the opposite of Christ, and it's ok.
I actually don't have anything to say this morning in a good way. I don't feel compelled to voice any opinion, am accepting that I have to do the work most aren't doing or can do, and that is alright too.
Are there any defects at play silently? There is a bit of dishonesty with the finances corrected. I'm thinking I can just throw it kind of, but to throw is to throw away, and the Christ man is saying "throw it away" and I'm saying, "Don't you wish."
Seriously though, there are some great College Football games on today. If Iowa and Clemson loses the CFP is fucked. Each team has great arguments why they should be in the top four. Clemson will only have one lose to a top ten ranked opponent, Bama had one bad game to a good team and kicked ass the rest of the way, Oklahoma has three straight victories over teams that were at one time in the top ten, Iowa will have one loss to a team that beat a top ranked team, and also has beaten a number of other top tier teams, Michigan State, the team I just spoke of in relation to Iowa, if they beat Iowa should be a lock, except for a weak loss to Nebraska that could be a huge factor. Ohio State had one bad game, losing to Michigan State, and also has a good argument if not a better argument than Bama since the Big Ten was just as good as the SEC in many ways this year. I'll stop there, because if you have two losses, you should not even be considered. Here is the thing, what if UNC blows Clemson out? If UNC blows Clemson out, that should be enough to put them in a playoff as one of the best teams. Here is my proposal. Do it like the NFL does, have the first weekend with four teams, 3 through 6, 3 plays 6, and 4 plays 5, then 1 and 2 get byes, then it's loser goes home after that.
Nobody is really talking about a six team playoff. Six teams would at least eliminate the two loss teams, if you've lost two games you aren't a Champion.
Sorry that was inconsiderate, I mean for practical purposes, there is no reason why a two loss team should be ahead of a one loss team, strength of schedule or not, "you play to win the game", like Herm Edwards said. You don't play to lose but have a good showing against strong teams in your schedule, you play to win, and if you lose, but then get rewarded like a winner, that's some kindergarten bullshit that makes us all more sissy's. What does that say about hard work, building dynasty's? Do you think Bama and Saban didn't work harder when they lost to Ole Miss? Clearly they worked harder and saw the liability of loss because they've been ass-whooping ever since. I'm hoping UNC blows Clemson out, and Michigan State runs the table on Iowa, because then there are six great arguments for six great teams, but unfortunately two are going to get screwed, and I bet it won't be Bama or Oklahoma. Even though Bama lost pathetically to Ole Miss and Oklahoma should have lost to TCU a few weeks ago. I'd be the most pissed if I were OSU, those guys lost by a measly three points to a very good team, yet they probably will be passed over if it comes down to it.
Anyway.
Replies