Now I am really confused. I got back part of results of the testing I had done on March 30th. The echo results I had said I had trace mitral valve regurg. which pretty much fits in with the trace/mild mitral valve regurg. mentioned in the ECG taken in 2005. It didn't mention any problem with the tricuspid valve. The ECG from 2005 said mild tricuspid valve regurg. go figure. I have my doubts about the person at least giving the current one though. She asked me twice if I had high blood pressure before she took it and mentioned how it was low and I said it normally is. She asked me if I had these tests done before and I said some and she asked me how they turned out. I didn't know about the regurg. then so didn't mention it. We will see what my primary doc says when I get all the info. in. Later.