The episode in question is from Season Six, Episode Eight, Tittled "Doubt"
"After a woman claims to have been sexually assaulted by her college professor, the accused academician agrees to help detectives Benson and Stabler by volunteering to submit a DNA sample for testing"
In the episode it is basically a he said she said scenario and we never get a confession or know the decision the jury come to as the episode ends as a jurer says "We find the defendant..." and then the titles role.
So what i am basically asking you Svu lovers is who do you think is the guilty party? I'm hoping to get a discussion rolling and people throwing ideas back and forth and maybe change or re-inforce my idea of who did it.
"After a woman claims to have been sexually assaulted by her college professor, the accused academician agrees to help detectives Benson and Stabler by volunteering to submit a DNA sample for testing"
In the episode it is basically a he said she said scenario and we never get a confession or know the decision the jury come to as the episode ends as a jurer says "We find the defendant..." and then the titles role.
So what i am basically asking you Svu lovers is who do you think is the guilty party? I'm hoping to get a discussion rolling and people throwing ideas back and forth and maybe change or re-inforce my idea of who did it.
However the way his daughter kept looking to him for prompts when she was being questionned, which makes him look like like a shifty character.