Resurrection After Rape Community Group
Discussion, question-and-answer, general social support, and journal processing for progress-oriented rape survivors. No crisis, no damaging or triggering conflicts--this is for individuals who want to contribute to collective, cooperative action toward the goal of making actual PROGRESS through rape trauma. Much of this work is based on the book "Resurrection After...
I thin one of the problems I had in the past was not realising I could evaluate therapy from any service. So because of that I never entered it as an equal nor with specific goals and characteristics I wanted to achieve or needed to have within my therapy. I was just grateful to have someone to talk to or wanting to be "fixed" so badly that I didnt think to really look at what I needed where I was etc. I think part of that was my age and so didnt feel equal amongst adults..never mind professionals.
I wonder if there could be a list specifically formed for teenagers?
My last session she did an exercise on trust and personal space that involved first finding out where my boundaries were..and then seeing how long I could manage a tiny breach of that personal space. For two reasons really..one being to illustrate how she felt i behaved emotionally. Although the exercise caused me a lot of anxiety I really loved that she was out of the chair and in the moment with me. Felt the most like a partnership since we began 9 months ago.
When I was doing my BA and considering a PhD in psych, I volunteered at a psychiatric hospital doing psych testing. One of the psychologists there asked me what orientation I was going to choose. He nearly had a heart attack when I told him "eclectic" and then gave me a lecture about how I wouldn't get professional respect, there was no discipline in that, and so on.
To me a single orientation is unimaginable. Behavioral techniques make a lot of sense when actual behavior or physiological responses are at issue, but they are of limited value if someone is wrestling with deep questions about the human condition. Behavioralism tends to view the inner life as a sort of epiphenomenon that will sort itself out once we become more "functional". Even when it comes to deep questions there isn't only one way. Some problems are helped by philosophical reflection (candidate for logotherapy?), others are best helped by experiencing and unpacking story, symbol (candidate for Jungian therapy?), and other evocative forms of communication (music therapy? art therapy?). Depth psychology can be really helpful with existential crisis, but it has the opposite limitation as behavioralism: it tends to view behavior as epiphenomenon and thinks our day to day lives will be magically sorted out if all is well in the inner life.
Also, there are differences of personality. Some people are doers and their inner life really does get sorted out when all is well in their relationships and daily routine. Others live in a world of intuition and feeling. If their inner life is disrupted they loose their most important tools for dealing with their outer life.
I think a good therapist needs to be able to take into account the nature of the problem a person is wrestling with and the personality of the client and choose methods and even clients accordingly. Knowing when none of the tools in your toolkit are right for a client is as important as knowing which tool to use.
If you can't evaluate yourself and adapt to a client as things go along etc and be willing to stand up for what you know works...you're never going to be this type of therapist. A lot of the stuff seems natural to my ears...but maybe it isn't. I also think from dealing with trainee counsellors...they can be so afraid to step away from the safety net. To be "radical" The way some of them are taught it is like they have been given the holy grail and to step away from that would be awful practice. When in reality we all know stepping away from the wall persona is endlessly more effective.
My friend was studying to be a counsellor and I would sit among her class mates and think...maybe only one of you is going to be a great therapist. Some came from mental health backgrounds (ie nurse etc) so their professional distance etc was already implanted. Some like my friend cling to the textbook and I cannot tell you the amount of times she has told me she knows my therapist at the time was being unprofessional because it's what she has been taught.
I think they must be taught to not question the methods or something. When I was a psychology student we were taught to question everything...because psychology, therefore therapy, is not an exact science and every generation has a new take on the previous research. Thank god really or we'd all be in mental institutes being given ECT for our depression and anxiety.
Dr. Zur's daughter contacted me and asked to become a friend of mine, and as we were writing back and forth she asked if she could share my own story with her father. I was thrilled! She and her father are both pretty amazing people. Zur has taken a lot of heat from critics who hear his philosophy--that therapists should represent these values--and attack him with innuendo. Yet he persists, and belongs in the company of people like Patch Adams, Dennis Kucinich, Studs Terkel, Howard Zinn, and (the fictional) Hawkeye Pierce.
I got back, "I've never pitied the fool." hahahaha. Oh, silly fishy.
He also said thanks for the vote of confidence and said Matt should put it in his book, lol. Now he's writing material? lol
I ended up having to cancel this week due to work, and he made a point to mention I did it after flattering him, lol. But he also said he was glad I was canceling for work, and not for "other reasons." Psh, whatever Gill! I'm there, sleep or no sleep! Where ya been??