Over The Fence Community Group
A quote from one of our happy Over The Fence members: "Hi JS- Thank you for the welcome message. Do you remember that show Home Improvement and the neighbor Wilson Wilson Jr. who would meet Tim the Tool Man at the fence, but never showed anything but his eyes? He was so funny. This group reminds me of those encounters... you get the wisdom, humor, and support from your DS...

No one in either party seems solid to me. Two years is a long time to go, and anything can happen. But I'm intersted to see what others think.
I'll note I've *never* called a presidential candidate or election correctly, so... Yeah.
NDY
I honestly don't have much of a stance on it at the moment. As has been said, it's really too early to tell. Most of the time the front runners so early in an election cycle fall the wayside by the time we get into the primaries which is why no one has formally thrown their hat in the ring even if political pundits are sure that certain names will wind up on the primary ballots come 2016.
If you were to believe the 24 hour news channels, then the race is between Chris Christie and Hillary Clinton. Now I would think that, at least at this point, if Hillary decides she wants to give it one more go, then the Dems will support that and basically tell most others to shove off, save for maybe Joe Biden (though I can't see him beating her in a primary). I'm not sold on the GOP being sold on Christie, mainly because the tea party peeps will feel he's too moderate for their blood and at least the early primary states may find it hard to be swayed into his corner (others might if he gains momentum though in the same way Romney and McCain did in the past two elections). At this point he seems the most moderate of the current names being brought up, which means he'd probably have the best chance in a general election but have the worst chance in the primaries. A lot remains to be seen though as to whether A) Christie will weather the storm that is "Bridgegate" and B) whether the GOP want to play to the conservative party loyalists or try to go for a more broadstroke approach that might help them get more independents and disgruntled Dems to their side.
Two years is a long ways away though... so much can happen to change the direction of the next election that speculating now is pretty much just a fool's game, which is why they're already talking about it on the 24 hour news channels.
Opinions, please?
NDY
If you repeat something enough, it is believed, even if untrue.
If you have the most money, you can buy the most ads to buy hte most lies to repeat the most often.
Considering the gerrymandering of districts, the shenanigans of eliminating primaries to choose candidates (as here in VA for governor), and so on? The ones we voted into power want to take away our power to vote. What does that tell us? Hmmm....
Tells me we need to GET eVERYONE TO VOTE. Even if it's just for a lesser-of-evils, at least VOTE. The system only truly fails when participation does, IMO.
Oh, and we definitely need to hold do-nothing Congresses accountable. If they can throw around words like "impeachment" to get on the 24-7 news cycle, then why can't *they* be impeached? The last ten years have been a horrifying disgrace.
We'll know when the BIg Money decides to tell Big Politics what to do, alas. They should wear stickers to show who sponsors them.... Like race car drivers!