Biblical Studies and Archaeology Community Group
The mission of this group is to provide a place to learn about ancient places and their history.Biblical studies may accompany archaeological discussions as they pertain to the Bible. Please refrain from any negativity as this should be place of positive reinforcement of our love for our Lord, Jesus Christ! May we all become God's ambassadors and embrace our...
Likewise, if Adam and Eve had children that married and reproduced before God made incest a sin, then it does not bother me. The marriages would have only been for a generation before they no longer had to marry brothers and sisters anyway.
If we are incestual, then its a more direct link to Noah, then Adam.
Genesis 6--->
10 Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth.
18 But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the arkâ??you and your sons and your wife and your sons' wives with you.
Also, meat eating got introduced after the flood, since the lion will lay down with the lamb, I wonder if we'll all be vegetarians in heaven?
Wouldnt that be something to be a vegetarian in heaven as I like a good steak now and again!!
As the women at this period seem to be myths, no one takes the trouble to tell from whence they came. It is sufficient that their husbands know, and it is not necessary that the casual reader should. The question is often asked, whom did Cain marry? Some expositors say that Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters living in different parts of the planet, and that they married each other.
so there you go you, for all any on knows, God put them on the earth for them to marry. it doesnt say he didnt. it doesnt say eve had daughters either, just that she had 2 sons, cain and abel. why even ask a question such as this?
I have also heard, as the shepherds chapel account suggests, that the adam and eve story of origin isn't intended to be the full account of the beginning of the inhabitation of the earth, but rather, the beginning of the ancestry of the Jewish people, Gods chosen, and that among the animals of the earth were also human animals, living outside of the garden... and that when cain and abel found wives, they came from other camps outside of the garden. Actually, this could support the theory of people developing from other primates, and wouldn't conflict with biblical creation, but would have just taken place independantly of the perfect garden of Eden.
One other thing which I just have to point on out in the interest of pure logic is this...
If Noah was a descendant of Adam and Eve.... then to say that we would only be descendants of Noah is to misunderstand HIS origin.... The notion that all of his descendants were destroyed by the flood (less those whom he took with him) doesn't change the notion that he was descended from Adam and Eve, and therefore, so is anyone who follows in his geneology. The only way that we could logically say that a descendant of Noah would trace only back TO Noah would be if Noah had been created by some means other than a direct geneological link to Adam and Eve.
In short, the suggestion is that Adam and Eve were not the first and only man and woman... but that they were the first of the chosen people who would come to be known as Jews.
Biblical writings use a wide variety of literary devices, elements and techniques. When studying the Scriptures, readers need to be aware of the different ways in which the writings are being presented.
http://mrbraiman.home.att.net/lit.htm or google "literary devices". (Metaphor, allegory, imagery, figurative
language, context... )
Be careful treading on shaky ground w.r.t. the idea that only the "Jews" are to be understood as descendants of "Adam and Eve". Jews traditionally attribute our ancestry and/or origin to the 2nd milleniun BCE at the time of the Patriarchs (Abraham, Issac and Jacob). A lot of "begetting" happened between the time of Adam and Eve's three sons and the nomadic life of Abraham.