Make Full Use Of Your Articles Source Package

Today, there is certainly not something wrong with this, I only think that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or consumers. Such resource boxes will only gain their site rankings in a... I run a post directory on my site, and I am seeing an increasing quantity of articles being presented, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This might be because of the growing quantity of PLR articles and material that's becoming available. Today, there's not necessarily anything wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or consumers. Such resource boxes will simply benefit their site ratings in any internet search engine that values incoming links. Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out is as follows. Much of the traffic to my post directory comes from search engines, by people trying to find information on a particular topic. In the event people need to identify more about http://copytaste.com/ae3495 , we know of millions of libraries you should pursue. Now, this user types in their keywords, clicks on the search box, and is given a summary of relevant sites. They selected one, and are taken up to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's source field at the end of-the article to see what else they have to say on this issue. There, they look for a link to a site advertising portable ringers. Is the reader likely to be impressed, or interested in this? Not very likely. They wish to find out about snowboarding, perhaps not modify their phone. In my opinion one of three things may happen then: The reader leaves the whole site in disgust. The reader clicks on the link to a related article. The reader clicks on the related Google AdSense (or similar contextual marketing) offer. If you have an opinion about religion, you will likely choose to check up about http://www.colourlovers.com/lover/gumalibi2 . They don't click the author's reference link. That's a potential consumer dropped, very probably permanently. Yes, put a link in to your website in the source package, but many article directories let many links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s related to the article subject as well, and ultimately put it in first, before you lose the client. 'But my site does not have anything regarding that matter onto it'! Then add something that does. Put a post listing, and have the source field saying 'To read more articles on this issue, click here.' Add a web service, and have the written text say 'To see links to websites on this issue, just click here.' Or simply go to Click-bank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, together with the link saying something such as 'If you want to learn more on this issue, buy this product.' Ultimately, not a direct url to the merchandise, but a cloaked or redirected one. Using this method, you still get that connect to your website that you were after originally, but, also, you have the opportunity to generate income from your reader in a fresh way. Visit http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/rainbed1/ to discover why to study it. A situation. Plus, you do not appear to be someone only distributing purchased material on any matter merely for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. An infinitely more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to make better use of the resource box?.