I was diagnosed about 5.5 years ago, and I have tried all but one of the CRAB drugs. Both changes were made due to adverse reactions to the medications. However, when discussing the results of routine MRIs with me, my neuro tends to suggest combining or changing treatments if he or the radiologist determines there has been new activity (usually inactive) since my last MRI (my neuro rarely agrees with what the radiologist reports, but thats another post for another time). He often mentions new things for me to try at my regular office visits (eg: vitamin D supplements, some antibiotic that I think treats acne but he says is supposed to be good for MS), but since he does not explain the research that supports them, I usually end up doing my own research before Ill do anything. Im confused because MS treatments so far only SLOW the progression of the disease and LESSEN the effects of exacerbations. Given that this is the case, is it a wise call to switch meds when there is silent activity since no med is proven to stop attacks? I feel like I would be out of options by now if I switched every time my neuro suggested I change what I am using.
Posts You May Be Interested In
I have been here before, a long long time ago and now I am back.Forgive me for not just saying what I want to say,even under a triple dose of antidepressants it is still raw and seeping and I am hesitant at revealing it as at least under the bandages around my heart I don,t have to look at how raw and wounded.My child was cleaved from my heart by his own actions. my child of ten,turning eleven...
I gave my 2 week notice last Friday 13th. Now to join you fine people in a life of leisure and nothing else to do but to look out for myself....is it just me or does that sound pretty boring? My goal was to live to retire and I guess having to take early retirement because of health reasons wasn't exactly the way I had planned things. I just can't stay in that building that is reeking mildew...