Primary Care Physician
Dr. Orrange received her BA in Biology at the University of California, San Diego, and a Masters Degree in Health Sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. She received her MD from the USC Keck School of…
FAST FACTS
Advertisement
The Case of Troy Davis: Pharmaceutical Companies Want No Part in Lethal Injection Drugs
Posted in Bereavement by Dr. Sharon Orrange on Sep 23, 2011
The case of death row inmate Troy Davis has sparked anger and emotion from many, including pharmaceutical companies who make the drugs that are now being used for lethal injection. In January 2011 the only US sodium thiopental manufacturer, Hospira, ceased manufacturing the drug used in administering death penalties.

When this happened the states started to buy the drugs from European companies, many of whom don’t endorse the death penalty, and this has caused a firestorm. Some are arguing that the European Union impose strict controls on drugs used in lethal injections to prevent companies from countries that don’t support the death penalty from being participants.

Pentobarbital, one of the three drugs set to be used to kill Davis, was bought from the Danish pharmaceutical company Lundbeck before its July announcement banning the use. In July 2011, Lundbeck Inc. demanded that U.S. distributors sign an agreement stating they will not make pentobarbital available for prisons using it for lethal injections. The dose used in Troy Davis was purchased before July.

An Indian pharmaceutical company Kayem stopped making Sodium Thiopental when they discovered it was being used for lethal injection in the United States and many others have followed.

If drug companies ban the use of their substances for the purposes of lethal injection, states will have to rely on the stashes they have (most about 12 doses) but they may be unable to get extra doses.

Many are now lobbying the European Union (EU) to impose stringent control to prevent EU companies from being complicit in future executions. It’s a strong point: for a country that doesn’t endorse executions, why should their drugs be used for lethal injection?

Many of us felt this was a tragic and seriously flawed case. But if anything, the execution of Troy Davis will change the ability to obtain the drugs for lethal injection that come from the EU so that countries who don’t endorse death by lethal injection don’t have to be participants.

Thoughts?

Dr O.


       Send to a Friend     Share This

MORE ARTICLES
CATEGORIES: News
TAGS:

MEMBER COMMENTS
TOTAL COMMENTS: 14 - View All Comments »

Add a Comment
Displaying comments 14-1 of 14
14
There is no comfort to be found in state-sanctioned slaughter. I am appalled that this is the only fully industrialized country that still kills its prisoners.
By kweigand909  Feb 22, 2012
13
I don't want my taxes to pay for truly "evil" people to sit in prison. I hope there will be a drug company that has the balls to still make and sell the drugs to humanly deal with these animals.
By NRieke  Jan 31, 2012
12
Capital Punishment is just wrong. It's just premeditated murder, and I don't care how it's done. I can't even fathom it.
By LaurieG  Oct 13, 2011
11
execution is not punishment. It is revenge. Yay for the rest of the world which is so far ahead of us, it's pathetic!
By bobinmaine  Oct 08, 2011
10
Poster #8 is right on the money, I think. When somebody is convicted of something especially awful (murder, mainly) a sentence of "Life Imprisonment" ought to mean just that. Lock them up and THROW AWAY THE KEY. PERIOD!!!
By madbookworm  Sep 27, 2011
9
PepperMan, I agree with what you are feeling. I dont think life in prison should be made pretty. It DOESNT seem fair that those "monsters" get the comforts of home...HOWEVER...I still feel there is too much doubt in the court system...too much fraud, pay-offs etc, to put ppl to death. And like I said, we dont have the right to play God. I dont know what the solution is...there prolly IS none. And that makes it a sad dilemma...
By blueguitargirl  Sep 26, 2011
8
There are indeed ''monsters'' out there...but life with
110% NO chance of parole is the answer. The States should
not be in the business of murder. The chance of making an
error is too great for humanity. When somebody figures out
how to manage our taxes properly, we can build prisons
specifically for lifers and hire the appropriate personnel.
By rlcpd  Sep 25, 2011
7
It is indeed an ugly business, but it is a necessary one. It is akin to putting down a rabid dog that you loved. There is just no pretty way to do it.
By CallieIsSober  Sep 25, 2011
6
As much as we hate to admit it, there are monsters. We can't re-educate them or rehabilitate them. They are what they are. As ugly a business as it is, monsters have to be destroyed so they can't hurt others.

And just out of curiosity, why can't we take some heroin out of the evidence locker give a monster an OD?
By OldManBear  Sep 25, 2011
5
There are some very horrendous murderers on death row. What they have done surpasses the language we have to describe it. On top of that, they live in secure surroundings, have 3 warm meals a day, get medical care, in short they live better lives than many of our poorest citizens. (Except for the lack of freedom.)

My problem with banning the death penalty is that "Life with no chance of parole" never means that. Everybody seems to get a chance of parole. So I will continue to support the death penalty until such time as society enforces "life with no chance of parole".
By ThePepperMan  Sep 25, 2011
4
There are several anesthesia drugs made in the usa that can be used for lethal injection. Propofol is one of them. I think the other drug they use is potassium which is made here too.
By Kara123  Sep 25, 2011
3
I have serious issues with state- mandated murder and I want no part of it. i think it is just as barbaric as people in countries who have public hangings or beheadings. I don't like to think of my own country as barbaric.

I'm just afraid that the bloody-minded types who are all "rah-rah!!" about the death penalty will just shrug and say, "Well boys and girls, it looks like we have to go back and light up Old Sparky again!"
By madbookworm  Sep 24, 2011
2
I've got no problem with the guillotine, gas chamber, or hanging but firing squads and the electric chair leave too much room for error.
By jekelhyde  Sep 24, 2011
1
I hope NO drug companies supply it anymore. I dont believe in the death penalty. I think its barbaric and if its wrong to murder, then why is it ok to murder someone becuz they murdered someone. There's too much doubt in the court system, and we dont have the right to play God or take a life. And for ppl such as my bf who say we shouldnt have to spend money to support ppl in prison for life....I dont wanna hear abt it. Our own govt squanders 100 times that cost on pure stupidness!
By blueguitargirl  Sep 23, 2011
Got a Question?
 
 
 
 
My Fans
RELATED SUPPORT GROUPS
Bereavement
(10,314 Discussion Topics)
Bereavement - Teens
(478 Discussion Topics)
DailyStrength Members Community
(2,365 Discussion Topics)
Families of Prisoners
(4,673 Discussion Topics)
Prescription and Synthetic Drug Abuse
(1,486 Discussion Topics)
War & Terrorism
(10,148 Discussion Topics)
War in Iraq
(625 Discussion Topics)