Marriage and Family Therapist
Cyndi Sarnoff-Ross is a licensed psychotherapist with almost twenty years of clinical experience in the fields of clinical psychology and organizational management. She has worked extensively with a wide variety of…
Advertisement
Todd Akin’s Seriously Harmful Statements
Posted in Rape by Cyndi Sarnoff-Ross on Aug 23, 2012
The recent outlandish statements made by Rep. Todd Akin R-Missouri, about the ability a woman’s body has to prevent a pregnancy from occurring during what he terms a “legitimate” rape, are not only preposterous but the very idea is emotionally traumatizing to rape victims.

Apparently, the source of his false information is a doctor by the name of John C. Willke , the author of a 1985 book entitled Abortion: Questions and Answers. The fact that Dr. Willke has been discredited by all reputable doctors, should have been enough to dissuade Rep. Akin from espousing this ridiculous notion, but unfortunately it was not. There is no science to support the claim that a woman’s reproductive organs will somehow know that an unwelcome intruder is trying to plant a seed and therefore her body will create an infertile environment. I am not a medical doctor but I can certainly interpret the numbers and gather information from the actual experts to help reveal the facts. The pregnancy rate for rape victims is 5%, which is the very same rate for consensual, unprotected sex. The fertilization of an egg and a sperm is not as simple as Dr. Willke or Todd Akin seem to believe.

While the uproar has made Mr. Akin a household name, and one that is usually accompanied by eye rolls of disrespect, it has also stirred up emotions in women who have been victims of this awful crime. Despite the facts, and even with all evidence pointing to the contrary, many rape victims feel somehow responsible for what has happened to them. Old misogynistic ideas about a woman wearing the wrong clothes or being in the wrong place at the wrong time linger in the ether. While it is true that we have come a long way from these antiquated beliefs, these are still sentiments often expressed by women during therapy and struggling with Post Traumatic Stress.

To make a statement that in someway implies that if a woman becomes pregnant as a result of a rape she is somehow a willing participant (because her body didn’t enlist some miraculous and fictional defense mechanism) is irresponsible at best and in my opinion, downright cruel. Treatment for rape victims can be a long and painful process and always involves removing the blame from the victim.

This is clearly a religious and political argument hiding behind some bogus science. I can respect a difference of opinion, even when that opinion is vastly different from my own, but to back up your argument with false information that is designed to manipulate and causes emotional distress only makes you even less credible.

Shame on you Mr. Akin for using a public forum to spread lies in an attempt to persuade people to your way of thinking. Reasonable minds can differ on the very emotionally laden topic of abortion but critical thinkers are capable of an honest debate.

- Cyndi

 RELATED FROM AROUND THE WEB



       Send to a Friend     Share This

MORE ARTICLES
CATEGORIES: Personal Opinion
CONDITIONS AND COMMUNITIES: Anxiety  •  Rape  •  Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

MEMBER COMMENTS
TOTAL COMMENTS: 24 - View All Comments »

Add a Comment
Displaying comments 24-5 of 24
24
That makes me so mad! As a victim of a rape that resulted in pregnancy I can tell you I was not a willing participant in any way. That he would believe such a moronic idea makes me wonder what other beliefs on the topic he or any other politician have.
By lizahbethml3r7u  Nov 17, 2012
23
It's statements like this man's that make rape in general impossible to believe in. If the case as he sees it, stands, then, if a woman becomes pregnant, as a result of rape, then, she was a willing participant. That is the same as the old saying that a man cannot be raped by a woman. When rape happens whether it be to a man or woman, physical bodies can be manipulated against the psyche and that is evidently clear in pregnancies from rape and men being raped. Shame......
By Beverley Powell  Oct 07, 2012
22
and I was also not a willing participant. so please watch what it says! this is cruel an harsh to me and my family! What a disgrace
By february282012  Sep 18, 2012
21
You know what, for me reading this was very affending. I am one of those rape victims that got pregnant from that. I don't care if it's what scientist say, not every body is the same.
By february282012  Sep 18, 2012
20
Very insightful article. Thank you.
By MojoPaw  Aug 29, 2012
19
oh wait...wait... How is THIS for a critical and honest debate (commentary, really) about Akins lies...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVC...
By Chipsy  Aug 26, 2012
18
The founding fathers of the US constitution owned slaves, for crying out loud. Women could be beaten by their husbands...raped, too...without any legal consequence. It wasn't that long ago that rape crisis centres didn't exist, nor did rape laws. Nations and nationhoods need to evolve or they will die, plain and simple. Same with religion. Those Christian sects that do not adapt to cultural and societal adaptions, will die out. (Sorry about 3 posts...character limits)
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
17
I understand that the US sees itself as a Christian nation...although it has many voting Muslims, pagans, Buddhists, atheists and agnostics, etc, who were born there. It also has many warring Christian denominations all claiming to be the religion of the founding fathers...the legitimate voice of "God". Sometimes laws need to exist to protect all citizenry, even if it goes against biblical dogma. There has been a separation of church and state going on since the Constitution was first penned...and thank goodness there has been, or blacks might still be sitting at the back of the bus, and women would not have the vote...in fact, women and children would still be seen as chattel of the males in their lives. Look at Afghanistan to see what that looks like. :/
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
16
Christmas is actually a pagan holiday. hehe Christ was born in the spring/summer. Most Christian holidays actually are pagan in origin. (Easter is too.)
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
15
Sorry, it is Bato.
By MattCURE  Aug 26, 2012
14
Gato,
USA is definetly not a secular government and as a matter of fact has only 100% Christian religion aspects in daily use. For example, Christmas is a federal holiday recognizing the birth of Jesus Christ. Thanksgiving is a federal holiday honoring God. The President and most government officials including judges take an oath on the Bible and state so help me God at the end. Crosses exist at military cemeteries. Invocations with prayers to God are common everyday occurences at government meetings. One nation under God in the Pledge, in God we Trust on our money, God Bless America in government parades, etc. etc. There is no Allah, Buddah, Mohammed in any of the above.

Also the federal funding issue is irrelevent to the HHS mandate decree. All employers whether they accept federal funding or not fall under the HHS mandate including my own small business so even if the Catholic Church decided tomorrow to take not a penny more, they would still be forced to comply and that is the issue.
By MattCURE  Aug 26, 2012
13
Wow, Matt. That's really interesting. I guess the Vatican is not too happy about that. haha

I don't feel the Church belongs in government whatever the sect...and that includes determining health care policy. There have been some really scary laws introduced by Republicans lately...such as forcing women (including rape victims) to undergo invasive vaginal ultrasounds and then to be forced to watch the results before an abortion can be performed. Of course...that would be in non Catholic hospitals.

I know Catholic hospitals are pretty prevalent in the US, and operate using public funds...so, it's pretty annoying to me that they refuse to dispense birth control, or offer abortions to women in need. If they accept public funding, their health care policies should reflect the laws of the land and not of the Church. You know, in some communities...catholic hospitals offer the only health care available. Some patients are unable to travel to a non Catholic hospital for full care.
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
12
Bato, in 2001 the United States Conference of Bishops allowed the use of anti-conception methods including morning after pill to rape victims that are tested not being pregnant.

According to RAINN, 54% don't report the rape. That is very sad. I would think then that 46% that report it to get medical treatment.
By MattCURE  Aug 26, 2012
11
But Matt, do you think most rape victims go to the hospital? RAINN says most don't report the crime, so, I tend to think most wouldn't go to the hospital or seek medical help while they are still in shock or trauma, unless they were injured to the point where intervention was necessary. There is so much shame and fear...

Pretty sure the Catholic Church is against RU-486. Were there a couple of rogue bishops who came out in favour of it?
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
10
A woman that is raped is typically treated at a hospital. The hospital can give a woman that was raped the pill RU-486 to prevent conception. Post-rape antipregnancy treatment is standard procedure nationwide because the treatment prevents implantation of a fertilized egg by causing shedding of the uterine lining. Even Catholic bishops approve this method.
By MattCURE  Aug 26, 2012
9
It all comes down to deciding whether what a woman has in her womb is a baby or something else. If it's something else, is it okay to kill it? Do you punish the child for the sins of the father? I'm sure if it were you in that womb you would beg and plead the mother to keep your life. Many people adopt children of rape victims, adoption is a wonderful choice. Rape is tragic and horrible, but abortion is a billion times more tragic for everyone, especially if that child would have grown to be famous or contribute greatly to society. I'm sure there are many children of rape victims out there who are happy to be alive.
By Davis88  Aug 26, 2012
8
I decided to start a thread for the topic of rapists asserting parental rights, because it's such an interesting and infuriating topic.
By bato  Aug 26, 2012
7
Not only would Republicans like Todd Akin like to see rape victims forced to carry their rape babies to term, the laws in 31 states would then give the rapists parental rights. That's right. Rapists are able to assert the same custody and visitation rights to children produced through rape that other fathers have. It's outrageous. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/opini...
By bato  Aug 25, 2012
6
I wonder if those who agree w/akin would change their tune if THEY were raped and had to worry about becoming pregnant because of the rape, and god forbid, carry a child for 9 months & then give birth to it, not to mention having to love & care for that child & every time they looked at it would be reminded of the trauma of the rape!

I wonder if they would want to put their own wives, mothers or sisters thru that. I just wonder....
By MyTrueColors  Aug 25, 2012
5
Todd Akin's infamoudly blundering comments echoed things I have heard "pro-life" people talk about years ago. Apparently, these notions were based on the "observation" that stressed-out women who couldn't get pregnant should "relax" and thus the reduced level of stress hormones meant that they could then get pregnant when they "stopped trying so hard." As an infertile woman, I find that notion to be just as insulting as Akin's clumsy remarks about rape.
By IronCelt  Aug 25, 2012

PAGE:  < Previous  |  1  |   2  |   Next >
Got a Question?
 
 
 
 
My Fans
POPULAR POSTS
RELATED SUPPORT GROUPS
Anxiety
(25,713 Discussion Topics)
Rape
(6,568 Discussion Topics)
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
(9,424 Discussion Topics)