Marriage and Family Therapist
Cyndi Sarnoff-Ross is a licensed psychotherapist with almost twenty years of clinical experience in the fields of clinical psychology and organizational management. She has worked extensively with a wide variety of…
Advertisement
Cohabiting Before Marriage
Posted in Breakups & Divo... by Cyndi Sarnoff-Ross on Jul 20, 2009

 

The decision to cohabit in a romantic relationship is an important one and the pros and cons should be explored before calling the movers. I have seen many couples on the brink of that decision who come in to discuss possible issues that may come up when they move in together. Each couple is unique and there is certainly no precise right answer but the evidence leads us to believe that it may not be the best idea to live together before marriage.

Study after study has shown that couples who cohabit before marriage, and specifically before getting engaged, are more likely to divorce than those who wait.  There are many variables that go into this outcome.  It may be that couples end up getting married after living together for a while because of social pressure or because they think it is the logical next step. Their commitment to each other may not have been clear in the first place. Additionally these couples report a lower satisfaction in their marriage if they have lived together prior. This may simply be a case of the newness and excitement having worn off. Expectations around what one is supposed to feel like once married are not met. Those feelings of excitement are for many, in part, due to the radical life change that comes from merging two lives together. This merging has already taken place for couples who have lived together.

People choose to live together for many reasons including the ability to see more of each other, financial reasons, and simple convenience. Another reason couples may choose to live together before getting married is to test the waters - to see if they get along living in the same home. This is often the case when a couple has doubts about the union and has some spoken or unspoken belief that there will be insurmountable challenges ahead for them that will eventually lead them to split up. In short - they are trying to avoid getting married and then divorced. Unfortunately, while this may make sense intuitively, it doesn't usually play out that way in real life. Of course there are couples who live together and are unhappy and therefore don't take the relationship to the next level and eventually break up. But many couples who have lived together for a while without being satisfied by the relationship mistakenly believe that getting married will shake things up and put a new shine on the union.

Considering your genuine motivation for wanting to move in together is crucial and if marriage is not something you aspire to for philosophical or ideological reasons then the move may not affect you in the same way as a couple who has individual goals of marriage. In those cases the initial thinking may be different. Individuals who envision themselves married at some point in their lives may want to consider why they would choose to move in with their mate instead of actually getting married or waiting to move in until they are engaged and have made a more intense, according to their own standards, commitment.

       Send to a Friend     Share This

MORE ARTICLES
CATEGORIES: News
CONDITIONS AND COMMUNITIES: Breakups & Divorce  •  Healthy Relationships  •  Healthy Sex  •  Interfaith Relationships  •  Life After Divorce  •  Single Dads  •  Single Parenting
TAGS:

MEMBER COMMENTS
TOTAL COMMENTS: 60 - View All Comments »

Add a Comment
Displaying comments 60-41 of 60
60
I have to strongly disagree with that last comment. Whether you're talking about romantic partners or platonic roommates, you really don't know someone until you've lived with them! Unless you're basically cohabiting without having moved out of your own home, be prepared for some SHOCKS!
By Spiky  Mar 17, 2013
59
I know that co-habitating is a myth that testing waters will get you anywhere. The statistics show that co-habitating dos nothing for the engagement or the life thereafter. Sometimes the guy is less likely to marry.

Check out Scott Stanleys book, "The Power of Commitment". He goes over the myths of commitment and what commitment looks like. I would reccomend it to anybody being engaged or dating.
By dpkid  Apr 25, 2010
58
I moved in with my husband in 1999 and we didn't get married until 2005. Still together and very happy. Personally I think it's a good idea to co-habit before marriage to get to know each other better. We then got married for legal reasons: we wanted to have kids and also were ready for each other to officially be next of kin (who do you want to have responsibility for turning off your life support machine - your Mum or someone you've known for less than a year?!) :)
http://www.bactrimusa.com/
By mar4ela  Nov 04, 2009
57
I lived with an ex-boyfriend and this was a good thing for me becuz we were previously friends for abt 10 years and he appeared he was such a wonderful guy & during the dating phase.
He was physically violent so I got out after living together 30 days. I was very shocked at his violent behavior so when it happened a 2nd time I moved out while he was at work. We had jail time and that also became more expensive the 2nd time around and inconvenient also, I missed work, my clothes were torn, things he deliberately broke.

I never felt pressure to feel that marriage had to be the next step although he was pressuring me to marrying him prior to living together. I thought that by living together he would stop pressuring me to get married. His family was great and I got along with all of the family --his sister and I were high school friends.

The only good thing that came out of this was I got to see
THE REAL PERSON, escaped unscathed.
By energylost  Oct 19, 2009
56
Very good advice! Thanks for posting!
By debiwebby  Aug 02, 2009
55
2ShyGirl - Well said and very insightful.
By CSR  Aug 02, 2009
54
I think given the current divorce rate many couples simply split up, even if they didn't live together before they got married. I think this is a good article because it is a reminder to consider your motives before you live with someone and then take that next step with them. I am engaged and already living with my fiance. I was married for 12 years and we didn't live together before our marriage and the marriage ended very badly. I learned that there are so many factors going into whether your marriage will last or fail. I think the key point in this article is that you really need to carefully think through what you're doing. Be mindful about your commitment, be honest with yourself, true to your wants and needs and communicate very openly with your partner. I didn't do these things very well when I was married before. Neither of us did. I hope I'm doing better this time. This article is a reminder to me that I cannot take my actions lightly and I cannot for granted things will stay as smooth and nice as they start out...
By 2ShyGirl  Aug 01, 2009
53
I goofed somehow and posted comment before done. I would add that I think it depends on your circumstances.I'm 45 yrs old...marriage to me doesn't have the same consequences/or rewards as say ,being 25 yrs. old and pregnant.I am not highly educated but have been there done that.Someone said that serious consideration was crucial and i think that's so true.It all depends on your personal circumstances.
By denicew  Aug 01, 2009
52
wow,this is an interesting subject so I decided to read all comments starting from # 1.What an amazing array of opinions.I see the value in each( some stand out more than others )
By denicew  Aug 01, 2009
51
wow,this is an interesting subject so I decided to read all comments starting from # 1.What an amazing array of opinions.I see the value in each( some stand out more than others )
By denicew  Aug 01, 2009
50
There is certainly a very precise right answer....Read the Bible.
God tells us not to do things because he loves us so much and does not want to see us hurt. He is not sitting up there with a big fly swatter waiting for us to mess up so he can let us have it. His word is a very precise way to live our lives so we can have all the best in every area of our lives.
By healthykick  Jul 28, 2009
49
I don’t find your article helpful, but instead, it seems to just muddy the relationship waters. It would have been good to have some questions to think about for a couple contemplating sharing living arrangements. Is it temporary, if so, how temporary? Will they talk together at a specific time about whether the relationship is changing? What if the relationship isn’t providing what both parties expected and there is a lease involved? What if there are children in the picture, are both partners going to work together to provide child care, or will it fall on the shoulders of one?

It seems to me that you use a lot of words to say something very simple: couples who go through the legal/ritual of divorce AFTER they have lived together experience dissatisfaction in the RELATIONSHIP. If you say this, then it seems pretty obvious why. Couples think that a piece of paper or a ritual is supposed to change the situation they are already in.

Sure, there are lots of reasons people give to explain their desire to live together. But you seem to settle on one reason, that is to see if a couple can get along in the same space. So there is doubt already in their minds. You bring up the idea that couples who are living together and are unhappy, but don’t take the relationship to the “next level” but then break up. I would be real interested to hear what your definition of “next level” is. In my mind, if a couple is living together and is unhappy, the “next level” would be to find someone who will help them sort it through.

If a couple is uncertain of their relationship, and they move in together, with a marriage certificate in their hand or not, the relationship is likely to end more quickly than a couple who is certain about their relationship. So the question isn’t really about whether to marry or not to marry, but “how committed do we want to be to one another? Are you the person that I see myself living with for the rest of my life?”
By SahKonteic  Jul 28, 2009
48
Just remember if you are already married and you have lived with cohabitation don't give up. It just means you have to try harder. Focus on the future, not the past.

Jason Monroe
http://www.jrsmedical.com">JRS Medical
By medicaljourney  Jul 27, 2009
47
Goofycats -
You are right. The correct verb is "to cohabit." "Cohabitate" is commonly-used, albeit incorrect.
By CSR  Jul 27, 2009
46
Cyndi et al.,

Would you guys please use the correct word for this practice?

It is not "cohabitate." It is "cohabit." Cohabitation is the noun used to name the practice of cohabiting. You folks are using a noun form in place of an already existing & perfectly serviceable verb, when you say cohabitate, and you sound like a bunch of ignoramuses.

A "habitation" is a place in which someone or something lives. Your home is your habitation. A burrow is the habitation of a fox.

A "habitat" is the overall environment which a group of species occupy. When the "--at" is added to "habit" it creates a noun.

"Habitate" is not a verb. " ---habit" is a verb form---"inhabit, " cohabit," etc. If you live in a house you inhabit it, you do not inhabitate it. If you live with somebody you cohabit or live together, which is what it literally means, with them. You do not cohabitate with them.

Those of you who are counselors must have completed high school, college and at least some graduate school, yes? Then you must have taken some English courses, and done some SAT prep. Try remembering some of that material.
By goofycats  Jul 27, 2009
45
This article is based on several different studies I have read over many years that continue to have the same findings. In answer to your question Flicka, I most certainly counsel couples based on their individual circumstances. The study results are not necessarily in line with my opinion and unlike other articles I have written here I am not taking a definitive stand on this topic. As I have said numerous times in both the article and in my comments, it is my belief that every situation in unique. I find research in the human sciences interesting whether I read it in an academic journal or a health section and whether or not I agree with it. Sometimes interesting things can come out of research even if the original hypothesis is flawed. In this case I do think there are some good topics of conversation that arise from the the ideas behind the study and there are some pitfalls that trip people up when they embark upon any serious commitment without doing so consciously. This statement does not mean that I think cohabitation before marriage is a bad thing.
Also - to "envision" something is another way of setting a goal and achieving that goal should never occur at any expense. Of course it is more important to do your best to chose the "one you should marry", as you say Flicka, than it is just to make sure that you actually marry! But people have different goals and marriage is not necessarily a goal for everyone and that will and should affect the choices that they make.
By CSR  Jul 27, 2009
44
The stats do need to take into account religion and tradition. For instance, many religions condemn adultery as defined by multiple partners after making the wedding vows in their religion. Adultery is a major reason for divorce. Their religion usually frowns on living together, and having sex without being married. The statistical sample needs to limit as many variables as possible to get an accurate count.
By EasyM  Jul 26, 2009
43
"Individuals who envision themselves married at some point in their life may want to consider why they would chose to move in with their mate instead of actually getting married"

Envisioning is different from knowing whether this person may be the one you should marry. Envisioning is expressing an ideal which could blind the choice for the most appropriate partner in effort to achieve your ideal faster. I think it is like skipping ahead on a vital point that could drastically change your desicion, therfore increase the risk of divorce.
By Flicka  Jul 26, 2009
42
Just out of curiosity Cyndi, in your counselling sessions in regards to cohabitating, do you advise your patients based on statistics or what seems right for their situations - i.e. do you try and dissuade patients for the sole reason that the statistics you believe are negative towards cohabiting?
By Flicka  Jul 26, 2009
41
This sounds like crap! My ex-husband and I are cohabitating and will be married in October. Our commitment is strong and I believe unbreakable. If people are getting married because of peer pressure or for whatever reasons that aren't the right reasons that seems to me to be the probem - not co-habitation. I live as though I am married and have no expectations that anything will change after we are married. I don't think co-habitation is the problem but maybe ignorance of the commitment that comes with the fact that marriage should be a forever thing. It's a convenience for a lot of people - like the next step for them - even though it may not be what is the right thing.
By Amethyst22960  Jul 26, 2009

PAGE:  < Previous  |  1  |   2  |   3  |   Next >
Got a Question?
 
 
 
 
My Fans
POPULAR POSTS
RELATED SUPPORT GROUPS
Breakups & Divorce
(80,116 Discussion Topics)
Healthy Relationships
(7,406 Discussion Topics)
Healthy Sex
(15,585 Discussion Topics)
Interfaith Relationships
(84 Discussion Topics)
Life After Divorce
(1,437 Discussion Topics)
Single Dads
(254 Discussion Topics)
Single Parenting
(1,332 Discussion Topics)