Pediatrician
Dr Shapiro completed his undergraduate education at UC San Diego earning a B S in Biochemistry and Cell Biology and a B A in Political Science He furthered his education at UCLA where he earned a Masters Degree in Public…
FAST FACTS
Immunizations III: The Early Toddler Years
Posted in Adoption by Dr. Jeremy F. Shapiro on May 30, 2009
 

Well, it certainly seems that despite my intentions not to spark any unfavorable dialogue regarding vaccines in a recent writing, I obviously failed.  And while I always appreciate hearing what others have to say, I am certain we can do this in a respectful manner.  My plan this time around is to continue sharing some of the basics about the following vaccine-preventable diseases as well as share (when warranted) my perspective on their respective vaccines.  And then, I certainly encourage everyone to communicate any thoughts or concerns they might have...with just one request, please remain tolerant of each other.

 

Varicella (AKA chicken pox): Many of us had the chicken pox...those 400-500 lesions scattered all over our bodies.  The lesions tend to be very itchy and often accompany symptoms of fever, fatigue, and that overall sense of just feeling crummy.  Prior to the vaccine, spread from person to person didn't require too much...just being in the same room is all that it took.  Spread can also occur from direct contact with the lesions and the incubation period (from time of exposure to disease symptoms) is about 2-3 weeks.  Unfortunately, one is contagious in the 24-48 hours prior to any lesions appearing and lasts until they all have scabbed over.  Now a question I receive time after time is "I got the chicken pox and I did just fine, why does my child need the vaccine?"  And while I do agree that chicken pox tends to be a mild disease, significant morbidity and even mortality can occur.  Prior to the vaccine, 1 out of 500 children with chicken pox required hospitalization (with some of these children developing encephalitis) and of 100,000 infants who acquired the illness, about 4 would die.  Furthermore, if a pregnant woman acquires the infection during the latter stages of pregnancy (just prior to giving birth or just after delivering), a great percentage of these newborns die.  Since the vaccine was introduced in the mid-1990s, the above numbers and concerns have certainly subsided but there are a couple of things that deserve mention about the vaccine:

  1. With those who have been vaccinated, we are still seeing some cases of varicella (for me about once every couple of months) that I call "breakthrough chicken pox".  What this means is 20-30-40 lesions scattered through the body, not really itchy, and otherwise, in good spirits.  There are no guidelines to keep these children out of school and because they are otherwise doing well, reassurance is all that is given.  And although I do not have the data to support my experience, I feel there have been more cases of shingles since the vaccine's introduction.  What ultimate impact this will have on the future...shingles cases, severity of the disease?  I'm not sure anyone has the answer to this.
  2. Data has also shown one dose of the vaccine (recommended after turning 1 year of age) may not provide complete or full immunity for a significant number of children so a second dose is now required near the kindergarten years.  I am certainly comfortable with a booster dose but it does make me wonder whether further boosters will be needed in the future, as well.  Current literature and belief says this will not be the case.

 

Hepatitis A: Although quite often a self-limited illness, symptoms usually include poor appetite, jaundice, fever and again, that overall sense of feeling crummy, but it should be noted in children less than 6 years of age, only 30% will be symptomatic.  Acute liver failure is rare with a case-fatality rate of about 0.5% and chronic liver disease will not occur with Hepatitis A (see other Hepatitis infections).  Transmission typically occurs via the fecal-oral route and the incubation period (the development of symptoms) is about 28 days (but even up to nearly 2 months), so by the time a community has an obvious outbreak, many members of the community will already by exposed.  The vaccine schedule for Hepatitis A includes 2 doses (with 6 months between doses) beginning as early as 1 year of age.

 

Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR): The characteristics of measles includes, fever, rash, cough, runny nose, "red eyes", and some particular lesions (AKA Koplik spots) that can be found inside the mouth.  A wide range of complications can occur, but the more concerning ones include encephalitis (1 in 1000 cases), subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE)...typified by a degenerative process in the central nervous system resulting in significant behavioral and cognitive loss and seizures, and death (1 to 3 children in 1000 cases).  Mumps is characterized by swelling of the salivary glands, most often the parotid glands...which are found in the head and neck region.  A wide range of complications can occur...including hearing deficits, neurological deficits and orchitis (inflammation of the testicles) which can result in sterility.  The symptoms of rubella typically are mild and usually involve rash, swollen lymph nodes and a low grade fever but there still exists (albeit very small) some complications including encephalitis.  The greatest concern surrounding rubella, however, involves a woman acquiring rubella during pregnancy, which can result in miscarriage, fetal death or congenital rubella syndrome...which can include eye, heart, hearing, and neurological consequences.  I've seen this and all I can say it can be so very devastating for a family to deal with.

And what about the MMR vaccine?  Well, it's no secret that this vaccine began the whole vaccine-autism controversy over a decade ago.  So for those looking for my take and a little bit of history behind the controversy surrounding this vaccine, I ask that you take a look at something I wrote a few months back...http://www.dailystrength.org/blog/410-history-behind-mmr.  And while I see no evidence to support splitting the MMR into individual components, I will agree that I am disturbed that the pharmaceutical company who had been making the individual vaccines, just recently ceased their production without any public explanation.  In a time where this is so much distrust and conspiracy sentiment, straightforward communication is key.

 

 

Dr. Jeremy



Displaying comments 36-17 of 36
36
What does it mean when you have a series of dreams going from having sex up to the child's early years?
A while ago I had this dream about having sex with some guy that I had no idea who he was. It stood out a lott because it wasn't one of those dreams that you just KNOW that you had sex, but it actually showed me having it.. Anyway, I pondered over it for a while and blew it off for nothing but an over-active imagination.
Maybe a month later I had another dream, only this time it was about telling my family that I was pregnant. My boyfriend (the same guy as before) standing by my side as I break the news to my folks. That dream freaked me out. When I woke up, I was scared half to death.
My next dream, or should I say dreams because I had two about the same thing, I was having the child. The first time, it was still-born. I woke up with tears in my eyes and a horrible emptiness that didn't go until I thought about the dream again. The second dream wasn't as dramatic and the child lived.
The final dream was about the child when she was older, the toddler years. All I remember was that I was older maybe in my mid-twenties, the father was gone, the child was 2or 3, and that I loved the child very much. All I wanted to do was hold her and protect her from the world and it's hostilities. That one also freaked me out. It was such a powerful feeling.
I haven't had anymore dreams about this in a while now, but I was wondering if anybody could tell me why the heck I had them, and/or what they might mean?
Buy Resveratrol
By nirmay  Jun 17, 2009
35
Are you comfortable with political/ideological indoctrination of children from toddler to university years?
Would you want the government to raise, nurture, condition and educate your children from their toddler years to their early 20s?
http://resveratrol-ultra.wetpaint.com
By nirmay  Jun 15, 2009
34
Let me contact the teacher I worked with because this man was over in Europe I read the article she had given me because i started to believe the whole vaccine thing. But much to my surprise they say its genetically linked and it has its "triggers" that cause it to happen. But let me find out and I will message the info to you...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Best-Ant...
By nirmay  Jun 11, 2009
33
The fact that you don't know the doctor's name tells me that you have done very little research on his study and the GMC hearing to which he has been called. His name is Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his study showed a possible connection between bowel disease and pervasive developmental disorder following the MMR. Of course it caused an uproar. I wonder why some of the doctors retracted? Perhaps they knew their careers were in jeopardy going up against the powerful pharmaceutical industry -the fact that the remaining three doctors are sitting before a GMC hearing is telling. The complaint was filed by a reporter named Brian Deer who has continued to report on the hearing with no disclosure about his connection to the case. The parents of the children involved in the study are strongly behind Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his study. Here is some more research for you including a film made about the case:

http://www.streamingvideoprovider.co.uk/popplayer.php?it=09694c2f408a&c1=%23a6a6a6&c2=%23a6a6a6&is_link=1&w=640&h=480&p=0&title=Selective+Hearing.+Brian+Deer+and+the+GMC+HQ&skin=0&repeat=&brandNW=1

http://www.proliberty.com/observer...

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3346281/the-witchhunt-against-andrew-wakefield.thtml

Both of my autistic nephews have significant chronic bowel problems while their healthy siblings do not. Regardless of the outcome of the GMC hearings, history will be kind to Dr. Andrew Wakefield.
By SparkyKC  Jun 08, 2009
32
Thanks.... I agree that there are triggers. I also believe that in some of the kids some of the triggers are vaccinations. Not in all kids but some.... thats why I think it is important to space them apart and clean up some of the toxins that are in the vaccinations. Just my opinion of course. My son was so allergic to eggs, wheat, and nuts... some of the vaccinations have eggs and wheat products in them and caused my son to get very very sick. Same thing happend to my cousin when he was a baby he almost died because of the egg that was in one of the vaccinations. Thanks a lot. Denise
By DeniseDies  Jun 08, 2009
31
Let me contact the teacher I worked with because this man was over in Europe I read the article she had given me because i started to believe the whole vaccine thing. But much to my surprise they say its genetically linked and it has its "triggers" that cause it to happen. But let me find out and I will message the info to you...
By CayleeBugsMom  Jun 07, 2009
30
Who are you refering to in regards to being in court over saying vaccines caused autism???? I am not trying to debate you but Dr. Rimland was one of the first people to say anything in regards to vaccines and he has died. Just curious who this is? Thanks Denise
By DeniseDies  Jun 07, 2009
29
I had my doc split up the doses so my daughter didnt get everything at once a couple months apart, and it had put her behind for a while but she caught up and is a bright and smiling child. No issues. I also work with A.I. children (autistic) and the Dr. who claimed the vaccines cause Autism is now in a court being charge with many things. Everyone who had originally backed him up admitted to misleading the public. So now we are seeing diseases all over the world we hadnt for a long time. My Sister in law who is many years younger then me. Has not had any vaccines. Someone in her elementary school had the german measels. She was immediately dismissed from school for over two months because of the exposer and risk to her. Now my hubby is also not vaccinated but I and my daughter are. My son will be to. I told him he can make whatever choice he wants about himself but because of the way I believe and the fact my hubby understands my point of view he has agreed for our babies to be vaccinated.

I respect those who choose not to like my in laws. Their 10 children do not have vaccines, well one because he joined the army, and they are all healthy children nothing wrong with them. But my sisters and I there is 6 of us have all been vaccinated again nothing wrong with any of us and if you ask me I believe the crap they put in our food is more of a trigger for autism then shots. But thats a personal belief not something backed up by research....
By CayleeBugsMom  Jun 06, 2009
28
? I hope not, and if you do, let me know what area you live in so that I can make sure I can keep my kid home if yours is sick!

sja that is a quote from your comment that is mean. You accused me without any evidence of what you are talking about. You choose to have to work. I chose to have no children until I could afford be a mom. I have given up my part time career to facilitate Oliver's healing and it is a great sacrifice, but worth it. You act like a non educated person and you should understand there are some children who suffer from vaccine injury.

I still look forward to the result of your challenge if you have the guts to accept the medical community at face value. Get all the vaccines for your baby. Girls have a better chance of not getting ASD than boys.

Like Denise, the therapists here say there is a huge increase in ASD with the latest group of little kids. It is not just better evaluation, it is a deffinate increase of mental issues that were not common a few years ago.
By Olismom  Jun 03, 2009
27
I wonder why people can't just agree to disagree? I have to say this though, sja.... staying home sometimes isn't such a luxury.... it comes with sacrafice. Olismom is home not as a luxury so to speak but her son has autism and I am not sure if you have a child with a disability but it is almost impossible to get afterschool care and or care at all. The price of childcare for a child with disability is about double of that of a typical child.

I also wonder why all this contraversy no one is saying not to vaccinate although I feel that is a personal choice of a parent and not an easy one at that. People are saying not to give 5 or more vaccinations in one day and to clean them up. Have you ever read any of the ingredients in them???? It is quite upsettling to say the least. I am not saying that vaccinations don't save lives but things should and need to change. My son got very very sick when he was receiving his vaccinations and to find out that he was allergic to eggs and other various things that are in vaccinations the hard way is unsettling. There is risk getting vaccinations and that is fact and there is risk not getting vaccinations and that is also fact. I am not sure what all this bickering is even about.... Olismom has her child vaccinated and she is not saying not to vaccinate she is saying to space them apart and I think that is a wise decision. Has anyone ever wondered why autism is on the rise... ADHD, ADD, auto immune diseases???? Our children are the sickest they have ever been and that is also a fact. We all want what is best for the children but fighting about it isn't the way. People can say that autism isn't from vaccinations or all the other things that are going on with the children but something is. It isn't just better diagnosis either.... my sons school psychiatrist has said in the 20 years she has been working she has never seen anything like what is happening right now. My town has 75 children on the autistic spectrum not to mention all the ADHD and ADD kids. Isn't there even the slightest chance that some of the kids have a weekend immune system at birth and can't handle all the vaccinations at once??? Why is it a one size fits all approach?? I am just saying that more research needs to be done and maybe not by the company's that are making the vaccination... who I may add have something to loose if they are wrong.... and that would be money. Sorry Dr. Jeremy I was really trying not to comment but this is crazy. Like I said no one is saying not to vaccinate (well maybe some) but maybe change things a little bit for the parents that want to take things slow. OMT.... there are all these sites about what happens to you if you don't vaccinate have you ever looked at the sites that list the ingredients of the vaccinations? Also, there is a risk.... just go into the immunizations site here on DS and check out some of the kids that lost their little lives after receiving vaccinations. Just wanted to point out that there are risks also involved in getting vaccination.
By DeniseDies  Jun 03, 2009
26
sparkyk, ok, I misunderstood you, and thanks for the link!
By sja  Jun 03, 2009
25
Yes, they have/had these diseases. I am not talking about third world isolated countries. Here is the data. Someone should be looking at why these countries are faring so much better and if these added vaccines are so life saving why are these countries so reluctant to add them to their schedule. Perhaps they are looking at the unfavorable outcomes in this country and holding off.

http://www.generationrescue.org/do...
By SparkyKC  Jun 03, 2009
24
Olismom, I have to work. I don't have the luxury of staying home and home schooling my child, and believe me, I would love to. Yes, it is my responsibility to take care of my child and their well being, and I also do that. I do not expose my child to illnesses whenever I can avoid it, but the fact of the matter is that kids get colds, the flu, even other illnesses.

My point is that I THINK it is irresponsible of parents not to vaccinate their children, you DO NOT have to agree with me. I trust my doctor and my parents who, thus far, have not led me wrong. I think you are an angry woman with an axe to grind, and that is your problem. I noticed you have autism down as one of your support groups, and if you have an autistic child, I feel for you. I have a close friend with an autistic child, and although I don't know what you are going through, I can sympathize. Arguing this is not going to change either of our minds, and I am sorry, but I feel that the risks of vaccines is far less than the benefits.

Do not tell me to get a reality check again. Do not tell me I am being mean again. My initial response to you was not mean, it was telling you an experience I had witnessed because of a group of peoples choice not to vaccinate.

I am an educated person, and have grown up in a household with people who are in the medical field. I know viruses mutate, I know that people are contagious before they show symptoms and I know that ALL medications, vaccines, what have you have some sort of side effect. I am not an idiot, and I would appreciate it if you would not treat me as such.

SparkyK, interesting read. I do have a question, though. You said that some countries do not have as many vaccines as we do. I understand what you are saying, but I have to wonder, do those countries have the instances of the vaccinated diseases that the US does/did. I have read that in some of the 3 world countries that are isolated from the outside world that some diseases we have, they don't have and vice versa. It happened with the American Indians. The settlers brought diseases to the New World that the Indians didn't have immunities against. Do the countries that don't vaccinate have the diseases we vaccinate against? Again an interresting thought.

Just putting it out there...
By sja  Jun 03, 2009
23
Well, this is going smoothly.
By DLR77  Jun 03, 2009
22
The swine flu vaccine used in the 70's is not effective for the strain of swine flu we are seeing today. And, it is noteworthy that only one person actually died from the 70's swine flu while hundreds developed Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis), became ill, or even died from the vaccine. The lessons go unlearned.

There are very real risks with vaccination and the compounding effects of multiple vaccinations given in quick succession to immature immune systems have never been studied. Never. When they added more shots to the schedule, and then some more, and then some more (and they are still adding more)- no one studied it. It has still never been studied. They refuse to do a study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. If you have faith in the program, I can not imagine a better way to end the debate and restore faith to the general public. If you are so concerned about herd immunity, then push for the study to be done. It appears that someone is a little too worried at what the outcome will be.

The questions remain unanswered as to why the countries with the lowest number of vaccinations on their schedule have much better outcomes than the U.S (which has the highest number of vaccinations on the schedule) - lower infant mortality, lower rates of autism, ADD, ADHD, allergies, diabetes. If you really wanted to improve outcomes for our children, would it not make sense to look at what the countries with the best outcomes are doing? We do know one group who do not appear to be handling multiple vaccinations well and that is our soldiers - our strongest and fittest.

My children are vaccinated. I did not research the issue at the time. I did not know there was anything to be concerned about. I respect the rights of parents who have probably spent considerable time and research determining that it is in their child's best interest not to vaccinate or to selectively vaccinate. I particulary respect parents who had an adverse outcome to vaccination and feel the need to inform others (since of course there is no disclosure in the pediatricians office) and our VAERS system for reporting vaccine reactions is pathetic. To dismiss all of these reports from parents as coincidental is offensive. Were you there?

No other parent is responsible for your child. If a parent feels that the risk of vaccination is greater than the risk of the disease, they are not responsible for risking their child for yours. If you feel you need to be careful about who your child is around when there is an outbreak of something, then do it. That is your responsibility. If you are so afraid that there are unvaccinated children in a public setting, such as school, then by all means, homeschool. And if you want other parents to be confident in the vaccination program, then stop insulting them and call your representatives to ask that the appropriate study be done. This debate will carry on endlessly until an objective study on the risks of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated are done.
By SparkyKC  Jun 03, 2009
21
sja I challenge you to give your 12 month child 1,DTap;2,opv;3Hib; 4,MMR; 5,HepB and 6,Varicella all together, as recommended. that is 10 diseases innoculation at once. Show us it does not affect your kid. Take a picture before and then 2 weeks later. Post video of her development

Prove your talk...take the walk, if your foot will get out of your mouth... Show us that those quanities are harmless at one time... PROVE IT
By Olismom  Jun 03, 2009
20
This is reality. Viruses mutate, especially over the course of decades. People need correct information, and if your child is too young then what is your beef. Stay home, like I did with my kids, then they will stay healthy. You need not fear me bcause I live in a major city where most of the folks are illegal and not vaccinated. I am not paranoid of them as I am of the RN who has not the care or compassion about the babies they are hatefully injecting without regard of the truth.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index...

According to a report in the May 30 edition of the French newspaper, Le Journal du Dimanche, the Sarkozy government has authorized spending of an estimated €1 billion to buy vaccines allegedly to combat or protect against H1N1 Swine Flu virus. The only problem is that to date neither the WHO nor the US Government’s Center for Diseases Control (CDC) have succeeded to isolate, photograph with an electron microscope and chemically classify the H1N1 Influenza A virus. There is no scientifically published evidence that French virologists have done so either. To mandate drugs for a putative disease that has not even been characterized is dubious to say the least.



Even more bizarre is the admission by the US Government’s Food & Drug Administration, an agency responsible for health and safety of its citizens, that the ‘test’ is approved for premature release to test for H1N1 is not even a proven test. More to the point, there is no forensic evidence in any of the deaths reported to date that has been presented that proves scientifically that any single death being attributed to H1N1 Swine Flu virus was indeed caused by such a virus. European epidemiologists believe the deaths reported to date are ‘coincidental’ or what are called opportunistic infections.








June 3, 2009 Bush: If elected, I'm going to Invade Iraq





Sarkozy’s Secret Plan for Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccination


by F. William Engdahl

.
Global Research, June 3, 2009



Email this article to a friend
Print this article







The French Government is developing secret plans to impose mandatory vaccination of the entire French population, allegedly against possible Swine Flu disease according to reports leaked in a French newspaper. The plan is without precedent and even defies recommended public health advice. Pharmaceutical giants benefit from the move, as the Swine Flu increases the trend to militarization of public health and use of needless population panic to advance the agenda.



According to a report in the May 30 edition of the French newspaper, Le Journal du Dimanche, the Sarkozy government has authorized spending of an estimated €1 billion to buy vaccines allegedly to combat or protect against H1N1 Swine Flu virus. The only problem is that to date neither the WHO nor the US Government’s Center for Diseases Control (CDC) have succeeded to isolate, photograph with an electron microscope and chemically classify the H1N1 Influenza A virus. There is no scientifically published evidence that French virologists have done so either. To mandate drugs for a putative disease that has not even been characterized is dubious to say the least.



Even more bizarre is the admission by the US Government’s Food & Drug Administration, an agency responsible for health and safety of its citizens, that the ‘test’ is approved for premature release to test for H1N1 is not even a proven test. More to the point, there is no forensic evidence in any of the deaths reported to date that has been presented that proves scientifically that any single death being attributed to H1N1 Swine Flu virus was indeed caused by such a virus. European epidemiologists believe the deaths reported to date are ‘coincidental’ or what are called opportunistic infections.



What we know conclusively is that the people who died often had prior respiratory complications of an undisclosed nature. People die every day with respiratory diseases. In the USA alone some 36,000 flu-related deaths are recorded yearly with no undue panic or alarm. Most are elderly or patients with lung diseases. To date in all France, 24 people have been identified by health authorities as even having ‘symptoms’ of H1N1. It is worth noting that the WHO and CDC list the symptoms of H1N1: temperature, coughing, headache, runny nose. Hmmmmm. Do you know anyone with such Swine Flu symptoms? Also worth noting is that in the counting of the more than 15,000 ‘confirmed’ H1N1 Swine Flu cases worldwide the vast majority made miraculous recovery within three to seven days, just as in the case of a bad cold.



The goal: Militarization of Public Health



Increasingly it is becoming clear that the successive waves of mass panic created in recent years by CDC, WHO and leading government agencies has an ulterior motive. We have been hit with mass panic over eating beef when cattle in the UK and elsewhere developed fatal illness that was called BSE or ‘Mad Cow’ disease. Later evidence emerged that BSE was the result of vaccination of the cows to kill harmless insects that got under the animal’s skin. More recently, after reports of incidence of what is called ‘Blue Tongue’ disease in cows, sheep and goats in Belgium and Holland in 2006, animal veterinary authorities in Germany, Switzerland and Austria imposed mandatory vaccination or treatment with drugs allegedly to protect the animals from bites by insects allegedly carrying the usually harmless illness.



The vaccinations of the animal herds has been made mandatory for an illness that typically was so mild as to go unnoticed and in only extreme rare cases could be tied to death. All animals after three months must be vaccinated. The vaccines, according to a report in the Swiss publication Aegis-Impuls from 2008, resulted in mass deaths, decreased birth rates, decline in milk yields, heart attack and other severe effects. The vaccines were used despite the fact none apparently had been previously certified as safe. They typically contained aluminium hydroxide and Thiomersol or mercury, as adjuvants and or preservatives, both highly toxic and both also used in most human vaccines.



Despite mass protests and reports to the veterinary authorities in Germany, Switzerland and Austria, the warnings went unheeded and mandatory mass vaccinations continued. Little wonder that farmers are taking their tractors to the streets to protest.



The report of a secret French government plan to vaccinate every French citizen over three months of age, over 100 million doses, is more than alarming. According to the French Le Journal du Dimanche, anticipating a probable return of the virus in the fall, the government will spend nearly a billion euros to buy vaccines. Authorities will announce in the fall if they decide to make the vaccine mandatory. "We will be ready to go in a very short time", explains the Minister of Health. According to sources, the state wants to order 100 million doses of flu vaccine from three laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Novartis. The latter two are French companies.



The French report comes just after the State of Massachusetts State Senate passed a mandatory vaccination bill that authorizes mandatory vaccination against purported H1N1 Swine Flu. In New York State the state hospital planning authority is debating making mandatory annual vaccination against flu of all public health employees, despite the fact that no approved vaccine for H1N1 exists. More and more it is beginning to appear that the scare about pandemic from flying birds or flying pigs is an excuse to justify mandatory vaccination with substances whose harmful side effects are demonstrably worse than any flu they should guard us against.



Novavax, a US pharmaceutical company based in Rockville, Maryland, conveniently enough just announced it is developing a vaccine for H1N1 based on “virus-like particles” that contain three key proteins of the flu virus without the genes required for replication. The vaccine is produced by techniques of genetic modification of organisms or GMO. The announcement came within days of the company announcing losses for the fiscal year of $36 million.



The drug Tamiflu which is officially recommended by the WHO as treatment to ‘ameliorate’ the symptoms of possible Swine Flu or H1N1 Influenza A as it has been renamed, is itself highly toxic. Health Canada informed Canadians of international reports of hallucinations and abnormal behaviour, including self harm, in patients taking the antiviral drug Tamiflu. In some cases death was the result and severe lung complications are widely reported associated with Tamiflu, the drug whose main financial benefactor is believed to be its largest stockholder, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.



In 1976 in the US President Gerald Ford, nervous about winning a close election ordered mass immunisation of the population in the face of a possible pandemic to show voters he was a ‘hands on’ President. The 1976 pandemic never came but a vast number of people suffered serious neurological side effects from the vaccine that was rushed into production, including 25 reported deaths from Guillain-Barré syndrome.



Mandatory vaccination with drugs whose side effects are unknown because they have not been rigorously and independently tested begins to smack of the kind of inhuman mass human experiments carried out in the United States with mentally retarded, prisoners and other disadvantaged people or in Germany during the 1930’s.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seeds of Destruction


The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation

by F. William Engdahl

Global Research, 2007 ISBN 978-0-937147-2-2


To order click here




This skillfully researched book focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish control over the very basis of human survival: the provision of our daily bread. "Control the food and you control the people."

This is no ordinary book about the perils of GMO. Engdahl takes the reader inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms.

The author cogently reveals a diabolical World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production. If the book often reads as a crime story, that should come as no surprise. For that is what it is.

Engdahl's carefully argued critique goes far beyond the familiar controversies surrounding the practice of genetic modification as a scientific technique. The book is an eye-opener, a must-read for all those committed to the causes of social justice and World peace.



What is so frightening about Engdahl's vision of the world is that it is so real. Although our civilization has been built on humanistic ideals, in this new age of "free markets", everything-- science, commerce, agriculture and even seeds-- have become weapons in the hands of a few global corporation barons and their political fellow travelers. To achieve world domination, they no longer rely on bayonet-wielding soldiers. All they need is to control food production. (Dr. Arpad Pusztai, biochemist, formerly of the Rowett Research Institute Institute, Scotland)

If you want to learn about the socio-political agenda --why biotech corporations insist on spreading GMO seeds around the World-- you should read this carefully researched book. You will learn how these corporations want to achieve control over all mankind, and why we must resist... (Marijan Jost, Professor of Genetics, Krizevci, Croatia)

The book reads like a murder mystery of an incredible dimension, in which four giant Anglo-American agribusiness conglomerates have no hesitation to use GMO to gain control over our very means of subsistence... (Anton Moser, Professor of Biotechnology, Graz, Austria).

To order Seeds of Destruction click here


F. William Engdahl is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by F. William Engdahl

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please support Global Research
Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.


Your endorsement is greatly appreciated


Subscribe to the Global Research E-Newsletter

Spread the word! Forward to a friend!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright F. William Engdahl, Global Research, 2009

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?co...




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Privacy Policy

© Copyright 2005-2009 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2009
By Olismom  Jun 03, 2009
19
I can't vaccinate my kid against pox, yet, because she is not even a year. Yes there is a swine flu vaccine, they used it in the 70's when there was a swine flu epidemic, and I do have a reality check.

I am glad your kids are vaccinate.
By sja  Jun 03, 2009
18
Again I need to explain MY KIDS ARE VACINNATED including for the pox for which YOUR CHILD IS NOT, so stop your crap trip on me. In fact there was no Swine Flu Vaccine, so again stop your crap trip and get a reality check. I could catch pox from your kid.....duhhhhh

Oh I see you need to just be mean like the other very promean people.

get it right when you debate what you are so not doing yourself...what a card....
By Olismom  Jun 02, 2009
17
Thank you so much for posting this, Dr. Jeremy! I have RN parents and am pro-vaccine, but I did question the Chicken Pox vaccine, since I did have them as a child and other than the insane itching, really suffered no lasting issues, but will have my daughter vaccinated, without question, because of your explanation of how the shots helped.

As for the MMR shot causing Autism, I was under the impression that in the medical field, there was no evidence to suggest that the MMR series caused autism, and I read in a parenting magazine in my OB's office that infact, research on several cases indicated that the Autism existed before the MMR series of shots began.

Olismom, I am VERY pro-vaccine, and although I understand everyone's right to have there kid vaccinated, I want to tell you a little story that happened in the area where I live.

I live in a community that has a bunch of little farm towns close together. There was an outbreak of Whooping Cough in one community because a group of parents refused to get their kid(s) vaccinated. Ok, that is their right, BUT because I had a baby who could not yet get her vaccinations for Whooping Cough because she was still too young, I had to be VERY careful who she was around. I understand that it is a parent's right to vaccinate their child, but on the other hand, what about the parents who do believe in vaccinating their children, and can't due to age requirements, that then have to worry about who their young newborn or baby is exposed to because others are so hell bent on acting on their rights. IMHO, it is irresponsible to not vaccinate your child, especially if you are sending them to a public school where not only is the child that is not vaccinated at risk, but every other child in the school is also at risk. Do you want to send your kid to school with the swine flu? I hope not, and if you do, let me know what area you live in so that I can make sure I can keep my kid home if yours is sick!
By sja  Jun 02, 2009

PAGE:  < Previous  |  1  |   2  |   Next >
Got a Question?
 
 
 
 
My Fans