Pediatrician
Dr Shapiro completed his undergraduate education at UC San Diego earning a B S in Biochemistry and Cell Biology and a B A in Political Science He furthered his education at UCLA where he earned a Masters Degree in Public…
FAST FACTS
Health Care Reform: What's the Status?
Posted in Caregivers by Dr. Jeremy F. Shapiro on Oct 05, 2009
As I wish I had some great insight as to the current direction of U.S. health care reform, I must admit I do not.  Just like many of you, my updates come from the newspaper, the internet, and maybe a medical journal or two that come across my desk.  But as we head into a month where the H1N1 influenza (AKA swine flu) and its soon to be released vaccine is dominating the medical headlines, I thought I might give a rather brief overview of where health care reforms stands this first week in October. 

 

So grabbing the major highlights, let me try to decipher where things stand in Washington these days.  Over this past weekend, in the wee hours of Saturday, the Democrats of the Senate Finance Committee completed a health care reform bill appealing to hopefully the greatest audience yet.  From what I've gathered, it would help ensure medical insurance for many Americans who don't already have it and prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to those in poor health.  If it passes through Finance Committee this week, it then moves on to the Senate floor...where the real fun begins.

 

I say this because the Senate Democrats will then try blending it with a previously designed one by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.  This is the one that would permit the government to sell medical insurance.  The Finance Committee version would not...obviously a major sticky point and one that doesn't appear the Senate would favor anyway.  But guess what, the House of Representatives does.  Both have different thoughts on where the funding is to come from (too much to cover here but safe to assume just about everyone...the wealthy, employers, Medicare recipients, etc.).  And of these three plans, all have different stances as to whether employers need to offer coverage to their employees. 

 

But please don't let my cynicism deter you from my hope that something good will come from this.  What it is is not exactly clear but a few major themes will probably find their way through the debate over the next couple of months: employer sponsored insurance plans are not going anywhere, exchanges will describe those entities where the self-employed and those working for a company that doesn't provide health insurance can purchase health insurance...the government will be involved with this, and Medicaid will be expanded to cover more low-income people. 

 

And my request as a physician...as your child's pediatrician...is pretty straight-forward...please allow me to provide best medical care I can provide for your child.

 

 

Dr. Jeremy



Displaying comments 25-6 of 25
25
What we really need is health insurance companies to take a look at their bloated costs. We need the health insurance companies to butt out of the doctors and the hospitals and let them do the healing without the insurance companies looking over their shoulders. It also bothers me how doctors have become salesman for the pharma company medicines, handing out samples like its a grocery story.

I hope something good comes out of this.
By Craig09  Oct 14, 2009
24
Dr Jeremy,
Thanks for giving us insight into how healthcare reform relates to you personally.

Jason
http://www.jrsmedical.com
By medicaljourney  Oct 09, 2009
23
Am I the only one that feels this way?

Jason
[URL=http://www.jrsmedical.com]JRS Medical Supplies[/url]
By medicaljourney  Oct 09, 2009
22
One of the main problems I have with healthcare is that a hospital has 15 different charges for the same procedure, medical supply, or prescription drug depending on which insurance company they are dealing with. If you have no insurance they charge you more than any of their contracts... This makes no sense to me. We need a standard rate for standard procedures so Doctors know what they should get paid & patients don't get surprised by a bill 3 months after their treatment.

My mother taught me to always negotiate with your insurance company and doctors and save money. Sadly hours on the phone always saves you money. This is yet another problem with our heath care system.

Jason
JRS Medical Supplies
By medicaljourney  Oct 09, 2009
21
Appleby:

With all due respect, please reference your statement that "45% of American doctors have stated they would consider getting out of the profession if ObamaCare is forced upon them".

According to a survey done by Mount Sinai School of Medicine, who polled 2,130 doctors nearly 75 percent polled favored a public option. 63 percent favored a public and private option. 10 Percent favored a public option only and 27 percent wanted private insurance only.

Personally, I doubt that those who have spent years, at a huge cost in college fees, etc., to earn the title M.D., are going to leave their chosen profession should a public option take place.
From the above poll mentioned, they would welcome it.
By jamsnjazzy  Oct 08, 2009
20
Years ago when my bride and i were courting i used to call her candy,i called her candy because she made my peanut brittle.
By frumpybumpas  Oct 08, 2009
19
Help,help,help. I am in desperate need of a good pecker stretcher and a new hard drive.
By frumpybumpas  Oct 08, 2009
18
interesting
By YTomLiu  Oct 08, 2009
17
Perhaps we should look at plans that have had overwhelming success such as those in the Netherlands. I am so tired of (USA) programs being degraded by labels.
By shakysara  Oct 07, 2009
16
(UK) Wanted to comment on No. 8 in particular. YOU ARE SO RIGHT. My Dad is 87 and got a stairlift fitted, handles to get in and out of the bath the door, etc and a pacemaker for his heart.
BUT - BEWARE Our Tories (Your Republicans), whatever they say, ensured a second class system where those that could paid for the best and the NHS was run down. The old were left to die on hospital trolleys and denied surgery.
It IS a political matter whatever those in power say.
By suey2y  Oct 07, 2009
15
Aren't you lovely??? Here in the UK, we wait with baited breath to see if Obama has the courage and charisma to provide you with what Nye Bevan gave us in the 50s - a system of excellence, free to all at the point of use, regardless of wealth, health status or political persuasion. Good luck.
I see that many Americans are suspicious of such a system. Such is the indoctrination of media. Done with skill and care what could possibly be better???????????????

OMG I just read through some comments.
HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BE WELL?????? THIS SHOULD NOT BE CONTROLLED BY BUSINESS (WHO WILL ALWAYS SEEK PROFIT) WAKE UP GUYS. HEALTHCARE IS A RIGHT FOR ALL. FOR ALL, HOW CAN THIS BE UP FOR DEBATE????? "NO, I WANT TO PAY, IT'S BETTER THAT WAY!!!! SAY WHAT??????
By suey2y  Oct 07, 2009
14
Universal health care is just the latest power-grab from a government that is completely over the top. These people want control over every aspect of our lives and they will not stop until they get it. The Us government now has a hand in the (failing) auto industry, and the banking industry, who would have ever forseen this a generation or two ago? Regardless of the form of any health care bill passed, the inevitable result will be a state-run medical system. Watch and see. They will take us hteir by increments. And no one will even see it.
By DreamButNoSleep  Oct 07, 2009
13
People are just stupid and love to yell and scream about things just because someone tells them to. Those who are making money off of medical insurance are 'stirring up the crowds" because if there is reform they will have to stop conning people. I am sick of insurance companies overcharging and deciding what medical care people can get. When they have to pay out they drop you. Why do Americans support this kind of behavior? Just makes us look like idiots. You want to continue to pay out to poeple who are taking advantage of you then do it, the rest of us who can't afford health care nor health insurance would like a break. That means reform. Instead of opposing everything why can't you stop yelling, use your brain and take a look at what is trying to be done. The only ones who will be hurt by reform are those who have been fattening their wallets at the expense of the people. Yes they will loose when there is competition and that is the only time the working class people can get a break. Time to do the right thing and stop letting financial greed be in control.
By desrtrse  Oct 07, 2009
12
Confusion and failure,the government.
By frumpybumpas  Oct 07, 2009
11
You cannot have a RIGHT to anything you cannot provide for yourself -- that is, to the labour of others. How are you going to exercise that RIGHT if the people who must provide it refuse to do so? (45% of American doctors have stated they would consider getting out of the profession if ObamaCare is forced upon them.) In Quebec they tried to solve the problem by sending bailiffs to the homes of doctors who had already put in a full day, to compel them under threat of arrest to spend another 12 hours working in an emergency room. Do you want to trust an exhausted man working at gunpoint to operate on you? Neither did the Quebecois, as it turned out; the exodus of doctors convinced them quickly and the directive was rescinded. You may have the RIGHT to surgery, but in Ontario there is frequently nobody and nowhere available to provide it to you. Your dog or cat will get quicker and better medical attention for a broken leg than you will. (In fact, some doctors have been busted for making side deals with vets to use their MRI equipment after hours because the two machines in Ontario are booked up until the Second Coming.) People here are frequently sent to the USA for treatment -- but NOBODY is sent to Canada when they cant get treatment in the USA. Canada has cheaper drugs than the USA (if you can get them) because Canada does NO research and development; the Americans research and develop the drugs that Canadians use. Make it unprofitable for them to spend the millions of dollars and many years developing drugs and where are you going to get them? Or are you going to bring out the guns and force them to produce for you? And will you trust the kind of medication produced at gunpoint? Sure you will, as long as you get it FREE!

And by the way, the only right to medical care you have in Canada is the right to get on a waiting list. If you call that health care. You can get that in the USA right now, too. Ontario has just quit paying for the most effective cancer treatment for colo-rectal cancer, right in the middle of the treatment cycle for current patients. So what if it works? It costs too much so you cant have it. And private insurance is forbidden here, as is paying cash, so if you have cash you can go to the States and get treated. Where will Canadians go when the USA is in the same boat?

I know you guys do not want to hear that socialist medicine is not the Gravy Train to the Big Rock Candy Mountain -- you never want to hear that socialism has never worked anywhere it has ever been tried. But just remember that if the government can force doctors to provide you with something you believe is a RIGHT, they can force YOU to provide so-called Rights for somebody else. You refuse to believe this will ever happen to you because all that matters to you is that You Get Yours and you dont care who has to pay. You will only learn the hard way.

Good luck.
By Appleby  Oct 07, 2009
10
Affordable health care should be a right. It doesn't look like Obama is proposing a socialist reform, just healthcare that's affordable and available to low income earners and also trying to stop insurance companies from wriggling out of paying up for some treatments.
Medical insurance companies earn a LOT of money. I would imagine there's some rich powerful people not very happy at Obama's proposal who would do anything to stop him. Very sad.
By orangegate  Oct 07, 2009
9
When, oh, when are we going to start questioning the huge profits those that provide drugs, medical equipment, and even bandaids, etc., (and doing something about it!) instead of listening to scare tactics that older people are going to be denied coverage and will have "death panels". Private insurance already denies coverage and basically only wants to cover those they deem "healthy" (basically so they don't have to pay out as much), yet charge outrageous premiums.

Everyone needs to be insured, no question about it, but when one hears it is going to be "affordable", just whose idea of "affordable" is it anyway? It is a fact that those over 60 will have four times the premiums of someone in their 20's. Those pretty much at the poverty level will be granted subsidies. And where do those subsidies come from? Not from drug companies, etc., but, in the long run, from you and I, folks..... Now, I don't mind paying my share of this, but not if it's going to line the pockets of CEO's and medical goods providers!

Those fortunate enough to be in a high income bracket will have an easier time paying premiums and won't feel the pinch. It is those caught in the middle that from what I can see will have the hardest time of it, should the Baucaus bill be enacted.

I think the majority of doctors truly care about their patients and what happens to them. I had an appointment with my pulmonologist the other day. I had to wait some in the examining room while I heard him talk to representatives from drug companies. When he came in to see me, he apologized and explained that although he might rather spending his time not seeing the representatives, he gets samples from them. He told me that this amounts to about $40,000 a year in meds he can pass on to his patients that need it, free of charge. Bless him.

My bottom line is I feel without a public option, it will be a boon for insurance companies. They will have a ready market, which cannot refuse it and once again more huge profits to be made, for even if they do not deny coverage they can possibly raise the premiums - much like was done with credit cards and their interest rates.

I also feel that no congressperson nor senator should be allowed to accept campaign contributions from health insurance corporations (or maybe any corporation for that matter).....too many are in the back pockets of these companies.

Sigh.
By jamsnjazzy  Oct 06, 2009
8
As an American now living in the UK, I want to point out that medical coverage over here, while not perfect, at least offers health care to all. DESPITE EMAILS MAKING THE ROUNDS... those over 59 are NOT DENIED HEART SURGERY!

I am angry at the numerous emails that have come around, even to me here in England, that state -- as if it were the truth, and it IS NOT THE TRUTH! -- that those over 59 cannot get heart operations because they are considered too old to be worth it.

I had an aortic valve replacement at the age of 55 (not quiet 3 yrs ago), and the woman across from me in the ward was 76! She was a diabetic. and had not only a valve replaced, but a triple bypass as well! Does that sound like the NHS (National Health Service) tosses out the "elderly"? There were others in their 80's, too!

Most health care is free, to a degree. There are many who have a co-pay for each med, but there is a pre-paid plan that offers quiet a discount if one has several meds a month. Each medication costs a bit over £6.50 each, per month (at the current exchange rate, that is equal to $10.37 USD) However, certain meds automatically are exempt from charge, like thyroid tablets and such.

I am not saying it is terrific here, but I know that things are far from perfect in the US as well. My heart issues began in November 2002, when my heart valve problem was first detected. Fine while I had health coverage through work, sure. But I was laid off, and could barely afford the COBRA payments.

Then when my unemployment ran out, forget it! Where was I to find $300 a month for insurance, PLUS the outrageous copy for each doc visit and the meds I needed? Local social workers could not even direct me to any place that could provide assistance! Obscene, to say the least -- I had worked and paid taxes for years, never on welfare or any other benefits, and this is how I am treated as an American citizen? Illegals can come in, get help, but I couldn't?

Something is wrong with this picture, Folks!

Thank God I happened to meet an Englishman and we married! Although I didn't know I would need open heart surgery back then, I am so grateful to have had everything taken care of here.

What ever would I have done had I been in home country???

No, health care in the UK is not only for a privileged few -- and by the way, PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE is also available, for those who do not want to be on a waiting list. (If your condition is life-threatening, you don't wait anyway -- you are moved to the top and taken care of right away!)

I do hope the American Government sorts things out. No one should be denied health care, or lose their home and their savings because they cannot afford the insurance either.

If it happened to one of your family members, or a close friend, would it THEN hit home??
By YamaBlonde  Oct 06, 2009
7
I don't want free health insurance either, but at least something affordable. I have two sick children at home. One with kidney failure and transplant, and the other one with lupus.
Its frustrating that last week the insurance employee told me that I had paid my deductible of 2,000.00, and I did not have to pay any more doctors visits for the rest of the year. I was happy of course. What they did not tell me is that I have to pay another 2000.00 for each one of my kids. I have three kids in total!!
How in hell I suppose to provide health insurance to my kids without going hungry????
I tried to apply for assistance, but as a single parent I make "too much money" according to them. :(
By catprincess01  Oct 06, 2009
6
I don't want free health care, I just want health care. I know that any health care I might get from the government will require me to pay for it, which is completely fine. I'm happy to pay, as long as they will actually give me insurance, since the regular insurance companies won't. And Sharon is right, emergency room waits in the US are horrendous... and afterward, you get a huge bill in the mail, and I promise you it is more than the $900 yearly fee required in Ontario... much more. Going to the ER is one of the most expensive ways to get care, and yet is often the only option for people who can't afford health insurance. Something in that situation just isn't right.
By thestonefaeries  Oct 06, 2009

PAGE:  < Previous  |  1  |   2  |   Next >
Got a Question?
 
 
 
 
My Fans