What is Multiple Sclerosis MS
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease which affects the brain and spinal cord. MS can cause a variety of symptoms, including changes in sensation, visual problems, muscle we...
Join Now
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease which affects the brain and spinal cord. MS can cause a variety of symptoms, including changes in sensation, visual problems, muscle we...

|
History of Copaxone.
|
Watch this |
| View More Posts Ignore |
From the Nuerology Now Sept/Oct Edition
Q: Why is Glatiramer Acetate therapies prescribed for multiple sclerosis (MS)? According to Cochrane Collaboration, the evidence does not support use of these therapies. A: Glatiramer Acetate (Copaxone) is one of four FDA approved injectable medications for relapsing-remitting MS. An assortment of four amino acids (the building blocks of our bodies), glatiramer acetate was originally developed to give laboratory animals a disease similar to MS called experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). When glatiramer acetate failed to cause EAE in the mice, investigators gave it to mice that already has the disease, and it helped improve their symptoms. After much laboratory and animal research, clinical trials were started in human MS patients. There were some flaws in the statistical methods used in these trials, and so the Cochrane Collaboration-- an international non-profit organization that reviews trials (Cochrane.org) --decided that these were not the best trials to support it's use. However, since the Cochrane Review was published, we have learned much more about glatiramer acetate, including how it works, the long-term benefits of staying on therapy, and even how it compares to beta interferons, the other class of injectable medications for MS. This also highlights how far we have come with MS medications; before 1993 there were no medicines for the condition, and now we have four injectable medications, two intravenous (IV) medicines, and dozens of ongoing clinical trials of IV and oral medicines. We have also come a long way in the methods we use to design the clinical trials, which only gave us a hint as to the full power of these medications. Daniel Kantor, M.D., is assistant professor of neurology and director of the Comprehensive Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Florida in Jacksonville, FL. Posted on 10/08/08, 08:10 pm |
| 16 Replies | Most Recent | Add Your Reply |
| View More Posts Ignore |
I sure HOPE Copaxone works !! Ive been on it since June'08 - BetaSeron and Rebif were unsuccessful and made me very depressed.
For those taking Tysabri, is it covered under a medical health plan ? Im in Canada and Im not covered (yet) & I sure like its success rate and its 1x/month dose - sure would be nice not to inject myself every night :)
|
|
|
|
||
| View More Posts Ignore |
What i wrote out was posted in the Neurology Now Sept/Oct edition that came in my mail yesterday. The Cochrane Review is old and it states that in the article.
Nice try. (;
|
|
|
|
||
| View More Posts Ignore |
We dont really know the long term benefits or dangers of any of these drugs. They are too new, and somehow I highly doubt these are the same drugs that we will be using in 40 years from now. We wont know the long term side effects or effectiveness for another generation or so.
In defense of Copaxone....If I remember what I read correctly....It seems to take almost a year before it reaches peak efficacy. That means that studies that look at shorter studies may determine that Copaxone is ineffective, while a 3 year study shows its equal to the other drugs. That could explain the conflict in opinion. I am not really sure about any of that though, its just what I read. Somewhat recently too.
|
|
|
|
||
| View More Posts Ignore |
Well I have been reading this post now for several days and decided that I would reply although it is not going to like by you Boo, and for that I am sorry.
I have been on Copaxon now for three years and it has totally changed my life for the better. Now I do have RRMS...and this drug has been the best one for me so far. It has cut my major relapses from 9 a year to 2 a year...and I am hoping it will stretch out even more. By major relaspes I mean..the lose of a function. Now I am not saying that Copaxon is for everyone...but for me and others as well it really has helped...and maybe they do need a longer trial peroid for this drug..who knows. I think that is part of the problem with Ms...no two of us are alike...we are simular..but our immune systems react totally different to different situations and drugs. Anywho....just a side from one of the many Copaxon users.
|
|
|
|
||
| View More Posts Ignore |
No one knew that I had MS...so at 58 and many relapses later, I have taken the I made it through before on just steroids and oral meds...so I plan to hold out ... Maybe not the 'bright' approach and I am NOT suggesting anyone to take the wait and see...If I have to go through side effects for me that is not worth it at the moment....The V.A. takes a how little can we spend on her therapy...so I have to really be in a relapse to get medication. The Steroid band aide is easier and cheaper for them.
|
|
|
|
||
| View More Posts Ignore |
WOW, you actually typed all that! Whew! LOL! There are two studies out there that have been done comparing Copaxone to Rebif and Betaseron. One is called Regard (Copaxone vs Rebif) the other is called Beyond (Copaxone vs Betaseron. Both companies, R & B wanted to prove their drug was more effective than Copaxone. One did not prove to be any better than the other.
Everyone is different and seems different things work for different people. You have to go with whats right for you and your lifestyle. To me, my quality of life is important. I tried Rebif when I was first dx'd and could not tolerate the s.e.'s. So its been LDN and Copaxone for me, so far so good. Once when the Shared Solutions nurse called me she said that Copxone was proven about 30% effective for the 2 yr trial and 80% effective for the 10 yr trial.
|
|
|
|
||
| First | Previous | Page: 1 2 | Next | Most Recent | Add Your Reply |
