What is Diabetes Type 2

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (formerly called diabetes mellitus type II, non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), obesity related diabetes, or adult-onset diabetes) is a metabolic disor...

Join Now

Free, anonymous support from people just like you.

We're on Facebook!
Check out our page!
DS Store is Open
DS t-shirts and more
Advertisement
Discussion:
Artificial Sweeteners
Watch this 
View More Posts Ignore
The facts about artificial sweeteners!

Sugar substitutes were originally made of fruit products. As time went on, it was found to be cheaper to simulate these fruit products with chemicals. So all artificial sweeteners today are just that...artificial.

The chemical makeup of these sweeteners becomes formaldehyde at 95 degrees F. Our bodies of course are 98 degress F. So as we digest these products, our body heat changes their composition into formaldehyde. Formaldehyde of course is what is used to embalm dead bodies.

Some products like succralose have more in common with DDT than they do sugar. Even though the FDA tauts it as "made from sugar". It is not. In fact the Sugar Association has disputed these claims legally.

Splenda is the trade name for sucralose, a synthetic compound stumbled upon in 1976 by scientists in Britain seeking a new pesticide formulation. It is true that the Splenda molecule is comprised of sucrose (sugar) — except that three of the hydroxyl groups in the molecule have been replaced by three chlorine atoms.

There are no long-term studies of the side effects of Splenda in humans. The manufacturer’s own short-term studies showed that very high doses of sucralose caused shrunken thymus glands, enlarged livers, and kidney disorders in rodents. A more recent study also shows that Splenda significantly decreases beneficial gut flora. No independent studies of sucralose lasting more than six months have been done in humans.

Recent studies in Europe show that aspartame use can result in an accumulation of formaldehyde in the brain, which can damage your central nervous system and immune system and cause genetic trauma. The FDA admits this is true, but claims the amount is low enough in most that it shouldn’t raise concern. (WHAT?...SERIOUSLY?)

Aspartame also has had the most complaints of any food additive available to the public. It’s been linked with MS, lupus, fibromyalgia and other central nervous disorders. Possible side effects of aspartame include headaches, migraines, panic attacks, dizziness, irritability, nausea, intestinal discomfort, skin rash, and nervousness. Some researchers have linked aspartame with depression and manic episodes. It may also contribute to male infertility.

Saccharin, the first widely available chemical sweetener, is hardly mentioned any more. Better-tasting NutraSweet took its place in almost every diet soda, but saccharin is still an ingredient in some prepared foods, gum, and over-the-counter medicines. Remember those carcinogen warnings on the side of products that contained saccharin? They no longer appear because industry testing showed that saccharin only caused bladder cancer in rats. Most researchers agree that in sufficient doses, saccharin is carcinogenic in humans. The question is, how do you know how much artificial sweeteners your individual body can tolerate?

That being said, some practitioners think saccharin in moderation is the best choice if you must have an artificially sweetened beverage or food product. It’s been around a relatively long time and seems to cause fewer problems than aspartame.

Basically, artificial sweeteners confuse your brain. The enzymes in your mouth begin a cascade that primes your cell receptors for an insulin surge, and when it doesn’t arrive your brain feels cheated. That’s why most diet sodas are loaded with caffeine — so you’ll still feel a jolt.

But even if your brain is distracted momentarily, soon enough it wants the energy boost you promised it — and you find yourself craving carbohydrates. In one study, people who used artificial sweeteners ate up to three times the amount of calories as the control group. But again, this is individual. It all comes down to the brain’s perception of calories, which can get thrown off whenever artificial ingredients are substituted for whole food.


Plain and simple, artificial sweeteners are chemicals, not food! They are body toxins. They are never a good idea for pregnant women, children or teenagers — despite the reduced sugar content — because of possible irreversible cell damage. If you decide it’s worth the risks, then go ahead, but pay attention to your body and your cravings. Once you start tracking your response to artificial sweeteners, it may surprise you.
Posted on 07/04/09, 11:07 am
18 Replies | Most Recent Add Your Reply
Reminder: This is a support group for Diabetes Type 2. We trust you will do your best to remain positive and helpful. For more information, see our rules of the road.

You may also create your own Member Groups where you can moderate the discussion.
Comment:
Email me when others reply to this topic help
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #11 - 07/04/09  4:04pm
" Forgotmath if your husband eats a balanced diet, his protein intake will be sufficient for his carb intake.

Remebmer too that complex carbohydrates have a completely different glycemic index and overall provide the best source of glucose. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #12 - 07/04/09  7:52pm
" SockFuzz, perhaps you might try rereading my comment. I said nothing whatsoever about diet, exercise, metabolism, etc etc etc. I made no comment whatsoever stating overweight people "have to eat noncaloric foods or limit proteins."

I simply pointed out that the study purporting that artificial sweeteners caused obesity did not prove causality whatsoever. It just showed that fat people are using artificial sweeteners and thin people aren't. Causality is a different thing altogether!

Like I said before, although fat people wear large-size clothing and thin people don't...obesity is not caused by wearing large-size clothing. Wearing large-sized clothing is caused by being overweight.

In my opinion, using artificial sweeteners does not cause obesity, obesity leads to using artificial sweeteners in an attempt to curtail calorie intake.....at least this is the case with every overweight person I know, including myself.


By the way, I am not a fan of bariatric surgery. I know at least 30 people who have had it, and maybe 1 of the 30 actually got down to something like an "ideal" weight. Most lost some weight, but remained significantly overweight. Some that I know lost weight, but regained it as they learned how to circumvent the limitations placed by the surgery! None of the people I know who did lose weight look healthy; saggy skin, poor skin color (nutritional deficiencies/maladsorption issues???)

Finally, I must say that there are millions of people in the world who would disagree that losing weight "isn't difficult at all". If that were so, no one would be fat. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #13 - 07/04/09  8:05pm
" Truthseeker it appears that you have quite a bit of pent up hostility. I hope you find the answers to your dilema. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #14 - 07/04/09  8:14pm
" In the end we all have to make the best possible choices that we believe in. It is vital that in that endeavor we research and educate ourselves. Not relying on one source or another, but as with food, a balanced supply of information.

Be open minded enough to realize that if one idea or attempt at something isn't working for you, try something else.

Remember, just because something is traditionally done one way, that doesn't mean it is the best or only way to accomplish your goals. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #15 - 07/04/09  8:32pm
" Your little "putdown" response seems a bit inappropriate....when in fact, I was simply clarifying my earlier statements that you seemed to have misunderstood.

When someone makes a statement such as the one you made pontificating on the supposed internal emotional state of another...it often means they have delusions of grandeur and innate feelings of superiority...I'm sure we all need help in our own individual ways.

Wishing you the best in getting the support and tools you need for all issues you are facing. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #16 - 07/04/09  10:25pm
" Sockfuz- your rambling on and on really has no meaning. I use splenda and often. It does not put weight on me because I am not eating mashed potatoes and lemon meringie pie. A few sips of diet soda satisfies my sweet cravings. Why don't you use Stevia - its all natural and so is that new one Truvia. People are fat only because they can't control their portions and they eat the wrong foods. For diabetics, some meds and insulin put weight on without trying. There's a joke as follows: "Did you know cottage cheese is the most fattening food ? All you see are fat people eating it" Closet eaters I would say.

If you can stick to your convictions, fine, but most of can't or won't. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #17 - 07/04/09  10:28pm
" p.s. Saccarin and Sweet & Low have the worst reputation. So much for your research. "
View More Posts Ignore
Reply #18 - 07/04/09  10:49pm
" Sockfuzz - I don't think you realize that Daily Strength is a support group - it is not a morbid conversation of all the bad things we are doing to ourselves - from artificial sweeteners to diabetic medications. Maybe we all know this. Perhaps you shouldn't be part of this group because as far as I can see you are upsetting everyone. "

First | Previous | Page: 1 2 | Next | Most Recent Add Your Reply
Advertisement

Advertisement
Content on DailyStrength.org is for informational purposes only. We do not provide any medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. More info
Portions of support group and treatment information provided by Wikipedia under the GNU FDL license
Copyright 2006-2009, DailyStrength, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Report Abuse | HSW International | HSW China | HSW Brazil